Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;9:786. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00786

Table 1.

Comparison of infarct volume and CBF based on ADC and ASL in two groups.

Control (n = 10 for 1 h and 7 for 4 h) Dehydration (n = 8) p-value
Volume of infarction (mm3)
  1 h after MCAO 39.4 (15.3) 59.9 (46.2) 0.573
  4 h after MCAO 75.9 (22.2) 105.5 (46.3) 0.040*
  Ratio of progression 1.46 2.34 0.121
  Absolute volume of progression 24.1(9.4) 45.6 (36.8) 0.021*
ADC value (× 10−6 mm2/sec)
 Infarct side
  1 h after MCAO 456.1 (53.6) 441.6 (54.9) 0.573
  4 h after MCAO 525.5 (75.0) 449.5 (46.3) 0.867
 Normal side
  1 h after MCAO 829.2 (45.6) 789.4 (40.8) 0.122
  4 h after MCAO 851.5 (41.3) 816.0 (44.4) 0.694
 Ratio (Infarct/Normal)
  1 h after MCAO 0.55 0.56 0.573
  4 h after MCAO 0.61 0.55 0.955
Relative CBF (ml/100 g−1min−1)
 Infarct side
  1 h after MCAO 10.6 (5.2) 5.7 (2.6) 0.101
  4 h after MCAO 10.9 (5.6) 7.7 (3.1) 0.397
 Normal side
  1 h after MCAO 25.6 (5.5) 19.8 (4.8) 0.027*
  4 h after MCAO 24.1 (2.8) 20.7 (2.9) 0.040*
 Ratio (Infarct/Normal)
  1 h after MCAO 0.42 0.30 0.408
  4 h after MCAO 0.44 0.37 0.613
Recovery of perfusion in 4 h
  Absolute value of infarct side 1.1 (3.4) 2.0 (2.6) 0.189
  Absolute value of normal side −0.1 (4.8) 0.9 (4.4) 0.121
  Ratio (4 h/1 h of infarct side) 1.1 (0.3) 1.6 (1.1) 0.054
  Ratio (Infarct/Normal) 1.1 (0.5) 1.6 (1.3) 0.336
*

p < 0.05.