Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 8;46(17):9027–9043. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky707

Table 1.

Comparison of Km and kcat among PfuHAN and its truncated proteins

ssDNA ssRNA
K m (μM) k cat (min−1) k cat/Km (min−1·μM−1) K m (μM) k cat (min−1) k cat/Km (min−1·μM−1)
HAN 3.6±0.2 0.096±0.01 0.027±0.003 2.7±0.2 0.064±0.005 0.024±0.002
D1 58.4±0.6 0.056±0.004 0.001±0.0001 46.4±0.4 0.034±0.004 0.0007±0.00005
D2 43.3±0.5 0.065±0.004 0.0015±0.0001 29.9±0.3 0.048±0.003 0.010±0.0004
D3 41.4±0.3 0.070±0.006 0.0017±0.0001 25.2±0.3 0.052±0.004 0.0016±0.0002
D4 14.1±0.3 0.084±0.007 0.0060±0.0001 10.4±0.3 0.058±0.004 0.0056±0.0005
D5 8.8±0.3 0.086±0.008 0.010±0.001 6.1±0.2 0.062±0.005 0.010±0.001

K m and kcat were calculated by double reciprocal plotting using the initial reaction rates at various substrate concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 μM). The kinetic parameters were determined in the presence of 15 nM PfuHAN and each truncated protein. The substrates are 3′-FAM-labeled ssDNA or ssRNA, and the released 3′-FAM mononucleotide products were quantified for calculating the initial rates. All data are the means of three independent experiments.