Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 26;19:711. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5057-3

Table 1.

Neuropeptide transcript differential expression statistics

Neuropeptide Cluster LogFC F P FDR
A-B D1 D3 D4
Carcikinin/ETH Cluster-5052.1 1.18 2.31 4.4 5.9 47.91 5.42E-11 2.63E-06
CHH-2 Cluster-569.33175 2.76 0.04 1.6 3.21 7.14 0.001 0.023
Neuroparsin-3 Cluster-141,623.0 −1.27 1.68 −0.32 0.14 7.03 0.001 0.024
CFSH Cluster-126,814.0 3.74 5.66 4.19 0.72 6.4 0.001 0.034
CCAP Cluster-569.9440 −0.62 −0.93 − 0.32 0.22 6.66 0.002 0.041
Bursicon-α Cluster-129,891.0 −0.57 −1.17 − 0.16 0.3 5.36 0.003 0.062
Bursicon-β Cluster-121,462.0 −0.54 −1.1 − 0.07 0.21 5.02 0.005 0.076
Allatostatin-CC Cluster-154,370.0 −0.35 − 0.9 0.02 0.22 5.52 0.008 0.112

Differential gene expression analysis statistics for five C. maenas neuropeptides which were differentially expressed across the moult cycle (P < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05, bold font above line) and three non-differentially expressed neuropeptides (P < 0.05 but FDR > 0.05, below line) within the CNS. LogFC are relative to moult stage C3–4. The P-value should be read in conjunction with the false discovery rate (FDR)