Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 26;19:711. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5057-3

Table 3.

Putative neuropeptide  G protein-coupled receptor differential expression statistics

Putative neuropeptide GPCR Cluster LogFC F P FDR
A-B D1 D3 D4
Short neuropeptide F R Cluster-4928.1 −0.48 5.09 −0.90 −0.56 50.25 2.45E-11 1.24E-06
Bursicon R2 Cluster-136,339.5130 2.78 0.90 3.04 3.70 9.81 7.49E-05 0.002
CCHa R1 Cluster-136,339.27034 4.93 11.30 7.01 3.68 10.80 7.82E-05 0.002
Relaxin R3 Cluster-136,999.0 4.38 5.89 2.70 0.85 9.70 8.10E-05 0.002
ITPR-like Cluster-133,078.1 1.18 −0.40 1.20 1.55 5.84 0.002 0.016
MOODY-like Cluster-136,339.8771 1.22 1.84 2.37 2.00 5.07 0.004 0.025
Ast-B/MIP-R1 Cluster-136,339.8223 1.34 0.34 1.10 1.79 4.59 0.011 0.049

Differential gene expression analysis statistics (F, P, FDR) for seven C. maenas putative neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptors which were differentially expressed across the moult cycle within the Y organ. LogFC are relative to C3–4. The P-value should be read in conjunction with the false discovery rate (FDR)