Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 13;2018:1585803. doi: 10.1155/2018/1585803

Table 2.

Comparison of studies on the treatment of CNV secondary to PIC.

Coco et al. [15] Peng et al. [12] Fong et al. [6] Menezo et al. [11] Zhang et al. [8] Our study
Study design Retrospective Prospective Prospective Retrospective Prospective Retrospective
No. of eyes 8 16 5 10 12 24
Treatment vPDT Conbercept vPDT+ Corticosteroid Ranibizumab Bevacizumab Ranibizumab +/- Corticosteroid
Initial BCVA (logMAR) 0.42 0.70 0.54 0.72 0.49 Ranibizumab: 0.68; Ranibizumab+ Corticosteroid: 0.82
Final BCVA (logMAR) 0.51 0.44 0.39 0.37 0.23 Ranibizumab: 0.34; Ranibizumab+ Corticosteroid: 0.22
Mean follow-up (months) 22.7 6 12 12.5 12 Ranibizumab: 23.3; Ranibizumab+ Corticosteroid: 24.5
Improved or stable BCVA (eyes) 5 (62.5%) 16 (100%) 4 (80%) 9 (90%) 12 (100%) Ranibizumab: 13 (92.9%); Ranibizumab+ Corticosteroid: 10 (100%)

Improved or stable BCVA means that BCVA of the patient kept stable (less than 0.1 in change) or was improved to more than 0.1 after the treatment.