Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2018 Jun 29;201:221–228.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.019

TABLE 3. Comparison of Q-SHIP Participants Who Did and Did Not Start Hydroxyurea.

There were no differences between those who did and did not start hydroxyurea according to previous hydroxyurea offer, participation in a group session or while hospitalized, or clinical variables including baseline hemoglobin and %HbF, ED visits, or intensive care unit admission.

Started HU after Q-SHIP
N=36
Did not start HU after Q-SHIP
N=30
p-value
Age, median years (IQR) 7.5 (5.0, 15.3) 9.3 (3.1, 16.3) 0.94
Reported previous HU offera 22/35 (63%) 14/30 (47%) 0.19
Group Q-SHIP session with other patient families 20 (56%) 15 (50%) 0.66
Attended Q-SHIP…
 …after only an ED visit
 …during a hospitalization
 …after a hospitalization

13 (36%)
8 (22%)
15 (42%)

10 (33%)
6 (20%)
14 (47%)

0.81
0.83
0.68
Days from ED or hospital discharge to Q-SHIP participation, median (IQR) 5 (2, 20) 8 (3, 28) 0.59
Baseline hemoglobin, mean g/dl (SD) 8.3 (1.2) 8.6 (1.0) 0.29
Baseline %HbF, mean % (SD)b 15.0 (9.5) 16.9 (9.3) 0.43
Number of ED visits or hospitalizations for pain or ACS in prior 2 years, median (IQR) 3 (2, 5) 2 (2, 4) 0.29
Prior PICU admission or transfer 12 (33%) 5 (17%) 0.12
Number of prior transfusions, median (IQR) 2 (1, 5) 1 (0, 4) 0.12
a

n=65, one patient did not compete pre-session questionnaire;

b

n=63, three patients did not have baseline %HbF.