Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Disord. 2017 Sep 6;25(5):420–435. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2017.1347417

Table 2.

Comparisons of Two-Group Nested Models for Emotional Reactivity, Mother Hostility, Father Hostility, and Eating Disorder Symptoms.

Model χ2 df p CFI RMSEA p(close) Δχ2 Δ df p(d)
1. Configural invariance 9.88 10 .45 1.00 .00 .99
2. Equal direct mother hostility 10.77 11 .46 1.00 .00 .99 .89 1 .35
3. Equal direct father hostility 10.84 12 .54 1.00 .00 1.00 .07 1 .79
4. Equal interaction 20.93 13 .07 .99 .03 .93 10.09 1 .001

Note. CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; p(close) = probability of a close fit to the data; Δχ2 = difference in likelihood ratio tests; Δ df = difference in df; p(d) = probability of the difference tests. Best fitting model is in bold.