Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Muscle Nerve. 2018 Aug 23;58(3):441–448. doi: 10.1002/mus.26173

Table 2.

Effect of hypoglossal nerve stimulation treatment on retrusive tongue muscle contractile properties

Maximum twitch tension(mN) Contraction time (ms)* Half-decay time (ms)* Maximum tetanic tension (mN) Fatigue Index (%)*
Young Adult Control 302.80 (14.24) 9.15 (0.23) 35.15 (0.98) 930.05 (48.06) 0.84 (0.02)
10 Hz 303.96 (15.40) 9.75 (0.29) 38.41 (1.24) 937.18 (51.97) 0.88 (0.03)
100Hz 303.24 (14.50) 9.79 (0.28) 38.45 (1.16) 901.92 (48.93) 0.92 (0.02)
Middle Aged Control 285.97 (12.70) 9.73 (0.22) 37.04 (0.95) 874.68 (42.86) 0.82 (0.02)
10 Hz 312.23 (15.68) 9.94 (0.31) 37.98 (1.34) 951.46 (52.91) 0.87 (0.03)
100Hz 310.91 (14.74) 10.84 (0.29) 40.32 (1.24) 909.75 (49.72) 0.90 (.03)
Old Control 321.10 (11.46) 10.09 (0.21) 37.14 (0.91) 889.86 (38.66) 0.83 (0.02)
10 Hz 300.29 (14.35) 10.34 (0.29) 38.99 (1.24) 851.10 (48.43) 0.89 (0.03)
100Hz 319.59 (13.42) 10.38 (0.27) 38.61 (1.66) 938.50 (45.30) 0.88 (0.02)

Data are expressed as averages (standard error).

*

p<.05 = significant differences among treatment groups.