Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2018 May 16;58(8):2068–2081. doi: 10.1111/trf.14647

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of autologous in vivo BioRBC survival in two groups of normal adults at two study sites using two different biotinylation buffers. Shown are the mean ± 95% CI for eight Iowa adults whose BioRBC‐54 were prepared using Iowa Wash Buffer18 (filled circles), and six Cincinnati adults whose BioRBC‐54 were prepared using Dulbecco’s PBS buffer (open circles).52 RCS of the two were compared using by linear mixed model analysis as described previously.53 The relative difference between the two buffers did not change over time, i.e., buffer*days interaction P=0.886, with no overall difference between the two buffers (p=0.490).