Table 3.
Population* | Number of Individuals |
Number of Heterozygous Variants Median (IQR) |
Number of Homozygous Variants, Median (IQR) |
Het/Hom ratio, Median (IQR) |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
CEU | 91 | 24,301 (21,185–28,283) | 32,199 (26,771–38,394) | 0.770 (0.730–0.800) |
FIN | 95 | 26,473 (22,500–30,951) | 34,623 (28,876–41,536) | 0.770 (0.739–0.799) |
GBR | 94 | 26,794 (23,991–33,319) | 35,563 (30,866–43,821) | 0.773 (0.744–0.797) |
TSI | 93 | 25,750 (22,514–29,834) | 33,005 (27,534–38,355) | 0.776 (0.747–0.817) |
YRI | 89 | 34,524 (29,252–41,074) | 38,646 (32,666–46,137) | 0.866 (0.839–0.890) |
Residents from Utah, USA with Northern and Western European ancestry (CEU), Finnish in Finland (FIN), British in England and Scotland (GBR), Tuscany in Italy (TSI), and Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (YRI). The difference in the Het/Hom ratio among the groups was statistically significant (P<0.0001, Kruskal -Wallis test). By Dunn’s test, the difference in the Het/Hom ratio between YRI and each of the other four groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). None of the other pair-wise comparisons were statistically significant (all P>0.05).