Table 3.
Data given as n (%). The table represents all cases of each implanting physician. regardless whether H2O2 was used or not. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PI between each physician.
| Incidence of pocket infection related to the implanting physician | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cases with Pocket Infection (n = 23) | Cases without Pocket Infection (n = 1.287) | |
| Physician 1 | 5 (1.5%) | 324 |
| Physician 2 | 0 (0.0%) | 91 |
| Physician 3 | 7 (2.3%) | 305 |
| Physician 4 | 6 (2.0%) | 297 |
| Physician 5 | 0 (0.0%) | 34 |
| Physician 6 | 0 (0.0%) | 31 |
| Physician 7 | 5 (2.9%) | 175 |
| Physician 8 | 0 (0.0%) | 30 |