. 2018 Sep 19;9:1350. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01350

Table 1.

Localization of candidate proteins obtained with different experimental approaches.

	*Particle bombardment (Arabidopsis)*	*Protoplast transformation (Arabidopsis)*	*Agrobacterium infiltration (Nicotiana)*	*Transgenic plants (Arabidopsis)*	Mass spectrometry^(Arabidopsis)**	Literature data
GrpE/eYFP (At5g55200^*)	a) Dual b) Mito	a) Dual	a) Dual b) Mito	a) Mito	Mito	Dual (Onion)^a Mito (Arabidopsis)^a Dual (Pea)^b
EF-Tu/eYFP (At4g02930^*)	a) Mito b) Dual	a) Dual b) Mito c) Aggregates	a) Dual b) Mito	a) Mito	Mito Plastid	Dual (Pea)^b
GCS/eYFP (At2g35370^*)	a) Dual	a) Dual b) Aggregates	a) Dual	a) Dual	Mito Plastid	Dual (Pea)^b
PDF/eYFP (At5g14660^*)	a) Dual	a) Dual	a) Dual	a) Dual	Plastid	Dual (Pea)^b Dual (Onion)^c
mtRi/eYFP (GB:X79332.1 ^*)	a) Mito b) Cytosol + Nucleus	Mito Cytosol + Aggregates	Mito Cytosol	a) Mito	–	Mito (Pea)^b
FNR/eGFP (GB:M86349.1 ^*)	a) Plastid	a) Plastid b) Cytosol + Nucleus	a) Plastid	a) Plastid	–	Plastid (Pea)^b

Dual, localization in mitochondria and plastids; Mito/Plastid, localization exclusively in mitochondria/plastids; Aggregates, protein aggresomes in the transformed cell.

a, b and c address distinct localization in different cells of the same experiment. Preferential or exclusive localization is highlighted in bold.

Accession number of the corresponding candidate gene;

^**

Data obtained from MASCP GATOR (Joshi et al., 2011; Mann et al., 2013) and SUBA4 Databases (Hooper et al., 2017);

(Van Aken et al., 2009);

(Baudisch et al., 2014);

(Giglione et al., 2000).