Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. 2018 May 15;190(2):117–132. doi: 10.1667/RR14888.1

Table 7.

Analysis of effect modification for the effects of thyroid and pituitary radiation doses on the incidence of hypothyroidisma: Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Modifier Cases PYR/10000 Exp(δj) Pb Pc
Time since exposure, years
 <10 228 5.4 1.00d <0.01 0.41
 10–14 202 4.5 0.90
 15–19 139 3.7 0.63
 20–24 106 2.8 0.33
 ≥25 85 2.1 0.21
Age at exposure, years
 <5 238 7.1 1.00d 0.01 0.16
 5–9 154 4.5 0.60
 ≥10 368 6.9 0.56
Attained age, years
 <25 383 11.0 1.00d 0.01 0.55
 25–29 133 3.2 0.54
 30–39 184 3.4 0.33
 ≥40 60 0.8 0.30
Sex
 Male 308 9.7 1.00d <0.01 0.45
 Female 452 8.7 0.41
Type of cancere
 Other cancers 193 8.1 1.00d 0.08 0.53
 Leukemia 194 6.5 0.07
 CNS cancer 127 2.0 0.46
 HL 246 1.8 0.33
Chemotherapyf
 No 190 3.5 1.00d 0.96 0.18
 Yes 570 14.9 0.98
CCNU
 No 704 18.0 1.00d 0.33 <0.01g
 Yes 55 0.4 1.39g
Cyclophosphamide
 No 450 10.3 1.00d 0.88 0.63
 Yes 309 8.1 1.01
Bleomycin
 No 690 17.6 1.00d <0.01 0.12
 Yes 69 0.8 1.77
a
Fitted model had the form:
RR(dt, dp, c)=1+ Gt(dt)×H(dp)+ Gp(dp)+θ c
where Gt(dt)=βtdteγ1dt+γ2dt2,Gp(dp)=βpdpeφdp and H(dp)=eγ3dp+γ4In(dp) and where dt, dp and c were radiation dose to the thyroid, radiation dose to the pituitary and chemotherapy (yes=1/no=0), respectively. See text equation 1 for additional specification. For effect modification of variable z with J levels, βt exp{Σjδt,jZj} replaced βt and βp exp{Σjδp,jZj} replaced βp, where zj, j=1, …, J was an indicator variable and exp(δt,j) and exp(δp,j) represented the relative changes in the linear slope parameters for the jth category in relation to level 1, where δt,1=0 and δp,1=0 for identifiability. Model includes 2×(J-1) distinct δt,jand δp,j parameters; however, the relative changes in across levels of a modifier were statistically homogeneous for thyroid dose and for pituitary dose, i.e., δt,j= δp,j for all j. Entries are homogeneous relative effect estimates.
b

P-value for test of homogeneity across levels of modifier; δ2= =δj=0.

c

P-value for test of homogeneity of modifying effects for thyroid radiation dose and pituitary radiation dose, i.e., , i.e., δt,j = δp,j for all j.

d

Referent category.

e

Model includes additional terms for the interaction of type of cancer and chemotherapy, θk, k=1, …, 4.

f

Model includes additional terms for the interaction of CNS cancer and chemotherapy, θk, k=1, 2.

g

The relative effects for thyroid dose and pituitary dose differed significantly. Among persons treated with CCNU, exp(δj) was 4.5 (95% CI: 2.4–8.6) for pituitary dose and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.36–1.9) for thyroid dose relative to those not treated with CCNU. The value of 1.39 is based on a model in which relative effects for thyroid dose and pituitary dose were constrained to be the same.

Abbreviations: CCNU=cyclohexyl-chloroethyl-nitrosourea; CNS=central nervous system; HL= Hodgkin lymphoma); PYR=person-years