Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 28;13(9):e0204644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204644

Table 2. Evaluation parameters from the prediction of bioactivity class of an independent NAA test dataset by the four classifier models used in this study.

 Classifier Models Accuracy (%) Kappa Statistics Area Under Curve (ROC)
Random Forest (RF) 82.81 0.65 0.91
Voted Perceptron (VP) 71.48 0.42 0.72
Sequence Minimization Optimization (SMO) of Support Vector Machine 85.94 0.72 0.86
Naïve Bayesian (NB) 73.05 0.45 0.74
Fused Model (RF and SMO) 82.03 0.68 0.92

Comments: RF: Random forest of 10 trees, each constructed while considering 11 random features. Out of bag error: 0.1797. SMO: The polynomial kernel. Fused Model (RF and SMO): The predictions from RF and SMO were combined (mean) using the “Prediction Fusion” node in KNIME [38].