Table 3.

Pair-wise cortical thickness comparisons by diagnostic group

	ROI	CON vs. SCZ	CON vs. PBD	CON vs. NPBD	SCZ vs. PBD	SCZ vs. NPBD
Frontal	2. Superior fontal				PBD > SCZ p = 0.001	NPBD > SCZ p = 0.004
	4. Caud. Mid. frontal				PBD > SCZ p = 0.033
	8. Precentral				PBD > SCZ p = 0.003
	9. Paracentral	CON > SCZ p = 0.004			PBD > SCZ p < 0.001	NPBD > SCZ p = 0.004
Parietal	13. Inferior parietal	CON > SCZ p = 0.033			PBD > SCZ p = 0.035	NPBD > SCZ p = 0.003
	14. Supramarginal	CON > SCZ p = 0.015			PBD > SCZ p = 0.009
Temporal	17. Temporal pole
	18. Sup. temporal
	19. Mid. temporal	CON > SCZ p = 0.027				NPBD > SCZ p = 0.032
	22. Fusiform	CON > SCZ p = 0.032			PBD > SCZ p = 0.004	NPBD > SCZ p < 0.001
	24. Parahippocampal					NPBD > SCZ p = 0.042
	25. Entorhinal
Cingulate	31. Caud. Ant. cingulate	SCZ > CON p = 0.028	PBD > CON p = 0.005	NPBD > CON p < 0.001
	32. Post. cingulate			NPBD > CON p < 0.001		NPBD > SCZ p < 0.001
Insula	34. Insula					NPBD > SCZ p = 0.016

Values shown reflect p values Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons for five comparisons within each region. Italicized values indicate regions that are smaller in control participants

Blank cells indicate a p value greater than 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons. No differences in PBD and NPBD groups was observed

ROI region of interest, CON control, SCZ schizophrenia, PBD psychotic bipolar disorder, NPBD non-psychotic bipolar disorder, Ant. anterior, Sup. superior, Post. posterior, Caud. caudal, Mid. middle