Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Aug 10;71:234–240. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.08.004

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazard ratios of risk for Alzheimer’s disease

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

HR (95%CI) p HR (95%CI) p HR (95%CI) p

Age 1.06 (1.03, 1.09) .000 1.04 (1.00, 1.07) .025 1.04 (1.00, 1.07) .022
Education 0.99 (0.92, 1.08) .933
Sex 0.89 (0.57, 1.39) .623
MMSE 0.79 (0.70, 0.90) .000 0.85 (0.75, 0.97) .017
AVLT-DR 0.89 (0.83, 0.95) .000 0.92 (0.86, 0.97) .005
FDG-PET 0.95 (0.94, 0.97) .000
1 APOE ε4 allele 1.51 (0.92, 2.47) .105
2 APOE ε4 alleles 1.92 (0.99, 3.71) .052
PE tn-2 10% -- 1.73 (1.10, 2.72) .017 1.58 (1.00, 2.48) .047
PE tn-2 7% -- 1.94 (1.23, 3.06) .004 1.79 (1.13, 2.81) .012
PE tn-2 5% -- 2.10 (1.33, 3.33) .002 1.93 (1.22, 3.05) .005

MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination. AVLT-DR: baseline Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed recall scores. FDG-PET: fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (N = 627). APOE: apolipoprotein E-4. PE tn-2: practice effects using a tn-2 distribution as defined in the text. HR: hazard ratio. CI: confidence interval. Separate backward stepwise Cox regressions were performed for PE tn-2 10%, PE tn-2 7% and PE tn-2 5%