Table 2.
Comparisons of relative abundance of gut bacteria between the obesity and control groups at the level of Phylum.
| Phylum | Obesity (Q1, Q3) | Obesity IQR | Control (Q1, Q3) | Control IQR | P-value | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum show higher relative abundance in control group than in obesity group | ||||||
| Candidatus_Saccharibacteria | 0.0037 (0 × 10−4 to 0.005 × 10−3) | 0.005 | 0.072 (0.006 × 10−4 to 0.241 × 10−3) | 0.235 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Actinobacteria | 0.138 (0.055 × 10−4 to 0.421 × 10−3) | 0.366 | 0.841 (0.162 × 10−4 to 2.491 × 10−3) | 2.329 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Firmicutes | 29.236 (21.179 × 10−4 to 40.813 × 10−3) | 19.633 | 44.275 (30.884 × 10−4 to 67.032 × 10−3) | 36.148 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0 (0 × 10−4 to 0 × 10−3) | 0.000 | 0 (0 × 10−4 to 0.04 × 10−3) | 0.040 | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Phylum shows higher relative abundance in obesity group than in control group | ||||||
| Bacteroidetes | 63.607 (55.231, 75.166) | 19.935 | 50.072 (24.965, 63.261) | 38.296 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Phylum show no difference in relative abundance between obesity and control groups | ||||||
| Proteobacteria | 2.313 (1.183, 5.314) | 4.131 | 1.362 (0.227, 3.295) | 3.068 | 0.051 | 0.119 |
| Unclassified | 0.0479 (0.025, 0.092) | 0.067 | 0.0710 (0.023, 0.418) | 0.395 | 0.061 | 0.122 |
| Armatimonadetes | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0.328 | 0.447 |
| Deinococcus_Thermus | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0.328 | 0.447 |
| Fusobacteria | 0 (0, 0.012) | 0.012 | 0 (0, 0.004) | 0.004 | 0.351 | 0.447 |
| Tenericutes | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0.328 | 0.447 |
| Lentisphaerae | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0.612 | 0.659 |
| Synergistetes | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0.587 | 0.659 |
| Cyanobacteria_Chloroplast | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0 (0, 0) | 0.000 | 0.706 | 0.706 |
Data are present as median (Q1, Q3) and interquartile range (IQR = Q3–Q1).