Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 15;645:1598–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.243

Table 1.

Efficacy ranges (combining plot or field scale empirical data and elicitation of expert judgement) for reductions in nutrient and sediment loss at plot or field scale for a range of mitigation measures targeting both riparian management and farming activities in the wider catchment.

Mitigation measure Efficacy ranges for pollutant reductions
Nitrate Soluble reactive phosphorus Sediment
Riparian relevant measures
Locate out-wintered stock away from watercourses 0–10 0–10 0–10
Establish and maintain artificial wetlands - steading runoff 10–50 25–80
Site solid manure heaps away from watercourses/field drains 2–25 2–25
Establish 6 m riparian grass buffer strips −30–95 −83–95 2–98



Measures for wider catchment
Farm track management 0–10 0–10 0–10
Reduce field stocking rates when soils are wet 2–25 2–25 2–25
Move feeders at regular intervals 2–25 2–25 2–25
Establish cover crops in the autumn 25–80 25–80 50–95
Fertiliser spreader calibration 0–10 0–10
Do not apply manufactured fertiliser to high-risk areas 2–25 10–50
Increase the capacity of farm slurry stores to improve timing of slurry applications 2–25 2–25
Do not apply P fertilisers to high P index soils 10–50
Loosen compacted soil layers in grass fields 10–50 10–50 10–50
Allow grassland field drainage systems to deteriorate 0–10 0–10 0–10
Re-site gateways away from high risk areas 2–25 2–25 2–25

Gaps indicate mitigation measure does not impact on the pollutant; – indicates risk of increased losses.