Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 21;96(10):4348–4359. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky296

Table 3.

Effect fish oil inclusion in low protein quality diets on growth performance of pigs after weaning

Dietary treatment1 P-value2
Item High Low0 Low1.25 Low2.5 Low5 SEM3 Treatment Linear Quadratic
BW, kg
 Day 0 5.24 5.44 5.04 5.18 5.36 0.15
 Day 7 7.19b 6.86a 7.04ab 7.11ab 6.92a 0.07 0.007 0.766 0.007
 Day 14 9.44b 8.95ab 9.27ab 9.18ab 8.80a 0.14 0.029 0.229 0.037
 Day 21 11.83 11.76 11.89 11.84 11.46 0.33 0.616 0.252 0.346
 Day 42 25.99 24.81 25.27 25.66 24.38 0.65 0.437 0.613 0.248
ADG, g
 Phase I, day 0–7 107b 60a 85ab 95ab 68a 11 0.007 0.766 0.007
 Phase II, day 7–21 353 357 350 336 328 29 0.475 0.124 0.776
 Phase III, day 21–42 654 615 629 651 609 26 0.649 0.858 0.301
 Overall, day 0–42 470 443 454 461 432 16 0.469 0.594 0.275
ADFI, g
 Phase I, day 0–7 165b 129a 138ab 145ab 135a 19 0.040 0.773 0.086
 Phase II, day 7–21 467 455 446 429 415 31 0.049 0.013 0.731
 Phase III, day 21–42 1005 952 998 1009 956 32 0.573 0.910 0.175
 Overall, day 0–42 682 646 666 668 635 32 0.494 0.598 0.259
G:F
 Phase I, day 0–7 0.569b 0.398a 0.514ab 0.564ab 0.440ab 0.04 0.042 0.722 0.014
 Phase II, day 7–21 0.748 0.773 0.763 0.761 0.770 0.02 0.883 0.985 0.618
 Phase III, day 21–42 0.661 0.650 0.641 0.659 0.644 0.02 0.783 0.916 0.764
 Overall, day 0–42 0.672 0.647 0.658 0.675 0.650 0.01 0.450 0.885 0.169
ATTD OM, %4 83.5 81.6 83.4 82.0 82.8 0.63 0.142 0.539 0.543

1Dietary treatments: [1] positive control (High; contained multiple sources of proteins, including animal proteins and 5% corn oil), [2] negative control (Low0; contained soybean meal as the main protein source and 5% corn oil), or 1 of 3 Low diets supplemented with increasing levels of fish oil to replace corn oil: [3] 1.25% fish oil (Low1.25), [4] 2.5% fish oil (Low2.5), [5] 5% fish oil (Low5) fed in 2 phases (7 and 14 d, respectively). All pigs received common phase III diets thereafter for 3 wk. Each mean represents observations on 6 pens.

2 P-values for the main effect of dietary treatment, and for the linear and quadratic contrasts of supplementing Low diets with increasing levels of fish oil.

3Maximum value of standard error of the means.

4Apparent total tract digestibility of organic matter during phase II (week 2 and 3 after weaning; 6 pens per treatment week); interaction between diet and week was not significant; therefore, main effect of diet only is presented; main effect of week P < 0.001 (ATTD OM = 80.4 and 84.9 ± 0.43% on week 1 and week 2 of feeding phase II diets, respectively).

a,bValues with different letters within the same row differ (P < 0.05).