Table 5.
Treatments2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item1 | Control | ANT | ADY | EDY | MDY | SEM | P < |
Animal#3 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||
Hp, µg/mL | |||||||
Day 0 | 338 | 304 | 304 | 403 | 381 | 44.3 | 0.42 |
Day 56 | 197 | 213 | 188 | 177 | 236 | 20.9 | 0.32 |
Day 112 | 202b | 164b | 356a | 359a | 372a | 22.0 | 0.01 |
Linear | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.81 | ||
Quadratic | 0.05 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
SAA, µg/mL | |||||||
Day 0 | 5.82 | 4.53 | 3.97 | 4.43 | 5.98 | 0.69 | 0.18 |
Day 56 | 5.54 | 5.92 | 3.54 | 5.24 | 5.03 | 0.63 | 0.14 |
Day 112 | 6.66a | 4.36b,c | 5.60a,b | 4.06c | 4.03c | 0.47 | 0.01 |
Linear | 0.33 | 0.88 | 0.04 | 0.65 | 0.02 | ||
Quadratic | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.97 | ||
LBP, µg/mL | |||||||
Day 0 | 17.96 | 15.31 | 13.93 | 14.95 | 18.71 | 1.66 | 0.21 |
Day 56 | 17.13b | 25.43b | 22.90b | 33.78a | 32.99a | 2.79 | 0.01 |
Day 112 | 39.73 | 38.12 | 40.71 | 31.42 | 31.62 | 4.13 | 0.33 |
Linear | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
Quadratic | 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
a,b,cLeast square means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
1Hp = haptoglobin; SAA = serum amyloid A; LBP = lipopolysaccharide binding protein.
2Control = no yeast and no antibiotics; ANT (330 mg monensin + 110 mg tylosin·steer−1d−1); ADY (1.5 g ADY·steer−1d−1); EDY (3 g·steer−1d−1; EDY consisted of 1.5 g ADY and 1.5 g capsule material); and MDY (1.5 g ADY + 3.0 g EDY·steer−1d−1); Treatment × days on-feed was significant at P < 0.01 for Hp, SAA and LBP.
3Ten steers from each treatment group were randomly selected for blood and fecal sample collection (Tables 4–6).