Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;10(9):293. doi: 10.3390/cancers10090293

Table 2.

Comparison of anthropometric and biochemical metabolic profile of WD GEP-NET patients under somatostatin analogues (SA positive) treatment versus patients with no somatostatin analogue exposure (SA negative).

Clinical Features SA Positive (n = 60) SA Negative (n = 36) p
WC (mean/SD) 96.2 (12.4) 96.7 (11.3) 0.198
TG (median (IQR)) 121.5 (73.3) 111.0 (91.5) 0.503
HDL (median (IQR)) 50.6 (13.3) 55.7 (12.9) 0.786
FPG (median (IQR)) 102.0 (22.0) 99.5 (20.0) 0.862
FPI (median (IQR)) 6.1 (4.0) 7.3 (9.0) 0.187
HOMA-R (median (IQR)) 1.4 (0.8) 1.5 (2.1) 0.438

WC (waist circumference), TG (Triglycerides), Fasting Glucose (FPG), FPI (fasting plasma insulin), HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance).