Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Methods. 2018 Mar 29;23(4):757–773. doi: 10.1037/met0000172

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Example surrogate WCC analyses for motion capture data with window size = 2 seconds and max time-lag = 2 seconds. (a) Data Shuffling, (b) 2-second Segment Shuffling, (c) 30-second Segment Shuffling, (d) Data Sliding. As with most other data types studied in the current article, (a) shows the most difference in the behavior of the WCC matrix with no discernible patterns at all. However, (b), (c), and (d) all look very similar. This is because, in most cases, the motion capture data did not yield significant synchrony values.