Table 3.

Combined quality index and EMG quality scores.

Authors (Year)	Quality Index Score (%)	EMG Quality Score (%)	Combined Score (%)
Arjmand et al. (2010) [41]	44	50	47
Burnett et al. (2004) [42]	90	100	95
Callaghan and Dunk 2002 [43]	67	50	58.5
Cholewicki et al. (1997) [44]	78	50	64
Dankaerts et al. (2009) [7]	100	100	100
Hashemerad et al. (2009) [45]	78	100	89
Hay et al. (2016) [46]	60	67	63.5
Kaigle et al. (1998) [20]	80	67	73.5
Kienbacher et al. (2016) [47]	100	100	100
Lariviere et al. (2000) [6]	90	67	78.5
Liu et al. (2011) [48]	70	100	85
Luhring et al. (2015) [16]	89	75	82
Mayer et al. (2009) [49]	70	25	47.5
McGill and Kippers 1994 [15]	78	75	76.5
Nairn et al. (2013) [50]	78	100	89
Neblett et al. (2003) [51]	89	67	78
Ning et al. (2012) [52]	67	50	58.5
O’Sullivan et al. (2006) [17]	100	100	100
Paquet et al. (1994) [53]	90	25	57.5
Peach et al. (1998) [35]	78	75	76.5
Sanchez-Zuriaga et al. (2015) [26]	90	100	95