Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2018 Sep 17;15(9):2027. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092027

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics (with means of the experimental groups in bold) and pairwise comparison of teaching methods for the Motivation constructs.

Motivation	Component	Measure	TT	GBL	GM	Sig. Kruskal Wallis	Pairwise Comparison		p Value
	Component	Measure	TT	GBL	GM	Sig. Kruskal Wallis	TM1	TM2	p Value
	Attention	Mean	2.55	4.43	4.40	0.001	TT	GM	0.001
	Attention	SD	1.16	0.37	0.40	0.001	TT	GBL	0.001
	Relevance	Mean	2.76	4.47	4.55	0.001	TT	GBL	0.001
	Relevance	SD	0.73	0.32	0.41	0.001	TT	GM	0.001
	Confidence	Mean	3.65	4.63	4.42	0.001	TT	GM	0.004
	Confidence	SD	1.12	0.32	0.52	0.001	TT	GBL	0.001
	Satisfaction	Mean	3.67	4.53	4.56	0.001	TT	GBL	0.001
	Satisfaction	SD	0.82	0.38	0.30	0.001	TT	GM	0.001

Notes: Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). TM: Teaching Method.