Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 24;19(9):2497. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092497

Table 2.

Effect of EBR on photosynthesis under low temperature stress in cucumber seedlings.

No. Pn (μmol·m−2·s−1) Gs (mmol·m−2·s−1) Ci (μmol·mol−1) Tr (mmol·m−2·s−1)
NT 9.09 ± 0.66 a 0.17 ± 0.01 a 207.25 ± 26.69 a 3.74 ± 0.16 a
CK 6.89 ± 0.25 b 0.13 ± 0.01 b 147.60 ± 11.30 b 2.10 ± 0.22 bc
EBR 8.30 ± 0.90 a 0.17 ± 0.04 a 201.64 ± 21.44 a 3.47 ± 0.39 a
BZR 5.60 ± 0.54 b 0.11 ± 0.03 b 104.26 ± 10.55 bc 2.01 ± 0.36 b

Means in the same category followed by different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 using the LSD test. The data represent the means of four replications ± standard deviation. Pn, net photosynthetic rate; Gs, stomatal conductance; Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; Tr, transpiration rate.