Table 5.
Alcohol-Free Beer Intervention | Traditional Beer Intervention | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before | After | Δ | p-Value | Before | After | Δ | p-Value | |
Serum lipids-subjects with LDL < 130 mg/dL | ||||||||
CT (mg/dL) | 170.5 ± 3.5 | 176.5 ± 4.0 | +6.0 | 0.14 | 170.6 ± 2.5 | 179.1 ± 3.8 | +8.6 | 0.04 |
HDLc (mg/dL) | 46.3 ± 2.2 | 47.0 ± 2.2 | +0.7 | 0.34 | 46.6 ± 1.7 | 48.8 ± 1.7 | +2.2 | 0.01 |
Non-HDLc (mg/dL) | 124.2 ± 3.1 | 129.5 ± 4.3 | +5.2 | 0.17 | 124.9 ± 2.6 | 130.5 ± 3.7 | +5.6 | 0.12 |
LDLc (mg/dL) | 108.8 ± 2.9 | 112.4 ± 3.5 | +3.6 | 0.35 | 109.9 ± 2.2 | 114.2 ± 3.4 | +4.3 | 0.18 |
VLDLc (mg/dL) | 15.4 ± 1.4 | 17.1 ± 1.6 | +1.6 | 0.08 | 15.0 ± 1.1 | 16.3 ± 1.3 | +1.3 | 0.13 |
TG (mg/dL) | 76.8 ± 6.8 | 84.9 ± 8.1 | +8.2 | 0.08 | 74.7 ± 5.3 | 81.2 ± 6.7 | +6.6 | 0.13 |
Serum lipids-subjects with LDL > 130 mg/dL | ||||||||
CT (mg/dL) | 215.6 ± 3.7 | 211.3 ± 6.9 | −4.3 | 0.49 | 226.1 ± 5.5 | 221.4 ± 4.6 | −4.7 | 0.22 |
HDLc (mg/dL) | 49.7 ± 2.5 | 49.3 ± 2.6 | −0.3 | 0.82 | 50.9 ± 3.5 | 49.7 ± 3.0 | −1.1 | 0.46 |
Non-HDLc (mg/dL) | 165.9 ± 2.6 | 161.9 ± 5.7 | −4.0 | 0.43 | 175.2 ± 3.9 | 171.6 ± 4.8 | −3.5 | 0.52 |
LDLc (mg/dL) | 147.2 ± 2.5 | 144.1 ± 5.3 | −3.1 | 0.51 | 157.2 ± 4.8 | 149.9 ± 4.7 | −7.3 | 0.16 |
VLDLc (mg/dL) | 18.7 ± 1.7 | 17.8 ± 1.9 | −0.9 | 0.45 | 17.9 ± 1.5 | 21.7 ± 3.0 | +3.7 | 0.22 |
TG (mg/dL) | 92.9 ± 8.7 | 88.4 ± 9.3 | −4.5 | 0.45 | 89.2 ± 7.6 | 107.8 ± 14.9 | +18.6 | 0.22 |
Serum lipid values for subjects with moderate CVD risk (LDL < 130 mg/dL) and high (LDL > 130 mg/dL) are given as mean ± SEM. Differences for values before and after four-week intervention with alcohol-free and traditional beer were analyzed by paired Student’s t-test. ∆ Percentage of change in plasma lipids levels after four-week intervention with alcohol-free and traditional beer. p ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance. TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; TG, triglycerides; VLDL, very-low density lipoproteins.