Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 6;15(9):1944. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091944

Table 3.

Associations of combined Tg and HDL-C status according to different combinations of high/low categories of these two lipids among those with T2DM (n = 181) and prediabetes (n = 197).

N (%) Unadjusted Adjusted
T2DM Cases Events OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value
Normal Tg and Normal HDL-C 140 (6.1) 2 (1.4) Reference Reference
High Tg and Normal HDL-C 40 (1.7) 6 (15.0) 12.56 (2.42, 65.15) 0.003 10.47 (1.99, 55.17) 0.006
Normal Tg and Low HDL-C 1455 (63.5) 64 (4.4) 3.35 (0.81, 13.82) 0.095 3.31 (0.80, 13.74) 0.099
High Tg and Low HDL-C 658 (28.7) 109 (16.6) 15.60 (3.80, 64.02) <0.001 12.75 (3.08, 52.65) <0.001
Prediabetes
Normal Tg and Normal HDL-C 140 (6.1) 4 (2.9) Reference Reference
High Tg and Normal HDL-C 40 (1.7) 2 (5.0) 2.09 (0.37, 11.94) 0.405 1.95 (0.34, 11.20) 0.453
Normal Tg and Low HDL-C 1455 (63.5) 110 (7.6) 2.88 (1.04, 7.92) 0.041 2.81 (1.02, 7.77) 0.046
High Tg and Low HDL-C 658 (28.7) 81 (12.3) 5.80 (2.09, 16.11) 0.001 4.89 (1.75, 13.68) 0.002

Adjusted for age, hypertension, and central obesity. Variables were categorized as follows: Tg (normal < 1.7 vs. high ≥ 1.7 mmol/L); HDL-C (normal M ≥ 1.04 & F ≥ 1.3 vs. low M < 1.04 and F < 1.3 mmol/L). Abbreviation: T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; CI, confidence interval; Tg, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein.