Table 3.
Strategies of intervention. Comparison between Italian and Greek PST (one-way ANOVA).
| Italian PST (n = 110) |
Greek PST (n = 84) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | M (SD) | F | p | η 2 | |
| Tell someone (range 0–6) |
5.66 (0.67) | 5.21 (1.24) | 8.14 | 0.005 | 0.053 |
| Tell the bully how the victim feels (range 0–4) |
1.91 (1.97) | 1.84 (0.99) | 0.14 | n.s. | 0.001 |
| Solve the problem himself (range 0–6) |
2.16 (0.97) | 1.68 (0.88) | 7.10 | 0.009 | 0.048 |
| Do not tattle (range 0–4) |
1.46 (1.33) | 2.56 (1.14) | 20.98 | 0.000 | 0.128 |
Note. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; F = Fisher’s ratio; p = p value; n.s. = not statistically significant; η2 = eta square.