Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 30;8(3):63. doi: 10.3390/biom8030063

Table 2.

The relation between hArg and cardiac structure and function. The outcomes were analyzed by linear regression adjusted for sex, age, BMI, and eGFR. Bold lettering indicated p < 0.05.

β for 1 SD Decrease of hArg (95% CI) p
LV structural echocardiographic parameters
LVM (g) 1.29 0.0677
(0.09, 2.67)
LVMI (g/m2) 0.63 0.0703
(0.05, 1.31)
LVD (mm) 0.34 <0.0001
(0.19, 0.50)
LVS (mm) 0.38 <0.0001
(−0.22, 0.54)
PWD (mm) −0.01 0.5514
(−0.06, 0.03)
RWT −0.003 0.011
(−0.006, −0.001)
Left atrium (mm) −0.07 0.3795
(0.09, 0.24)
Aorta (mm) 0.07 0.2396
(−0.05, −0.19)
LV systolic functional echocardiographic parameters
LVEF (%) −0.47 0.0043
(−0.79, −0.15)
Fractional shortening (%) −0.35 0.0141
(−0.62, −0.07)
LV diastolic functional echocardiographic parameters
MV E-wave (mm/s) −0.002 0.2607
(−0.008, 0.002)
MV A-wave (mm/s) −0.003 0.1708
(−0.008, 0.001)
MV duration A-wave (ms) 0.41 0.2844
(−0.34, 1.17)
MV dec. time (ms) 0.24 0.7166
(−1.08, 1.57)
E/e ratio −0.02 0.4205
(−0.08, 0.04)
RV structural echocardiographic parameters
RV (mm) −0.0006 0.9422
(−0.02, 0.02)
RVOT (cm) 0.01 0.07
(−0.001, 0.03)
RV systolic functional echocardiographic parameters
TAPSE (cm) −0.009 0.1772
(−0.023, 0.004)
PV acc. time (ms) 0.39 0.3755
(−0.48, 1.26)
PV acc. slope −0.04 0.1977
(−0.12, 0.02)