Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 18;19(9):2808. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092808

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of the distance and angle of the affinity attacks of the four complexes during the 200 ns simulations. (A) The angle of C12′(α-ZOL)–O(α-ZOL)–OG(Ser102) for WT α-ZOL and V153H α-ZOL. (B) The angle of C12′(β-ZOL)–O(β-ZOL)–OG(Ser102) for WT β-ZOL and V153H β-ZOL. (C) The change in angle of (A) during the 200 ns simulations. (D) The change in the angle of (B) during the 200 ns simulations. (E) The distance between α-ZOL:C12′ and Ser102:OG in WT α-ZOL and V153H α-ZOL. (F) The distance between β-ZOL:C12′ and Ser102:OG in WT β-ZOL and V153H β-ZOL.