Table 2.
Metabolic syndrome prevalence according to sex and by the standard of work.
| Sex | Employment Type | Metabolic Syndrome, N (%) | Total | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||
| Male | Standard workers | 942 (26.4) | 2619 (73.6) | 3561 (100.0) | 0.174 |
| Non-standard workers | 400 (28.2) | 1045 (71.8) | 1445 (100.0) | ||
| Total | 1342 (26.6) | 3664 (73.4) | 5006 (100.0) | ||
| Female | Standard workers | 271 (13.5) | 1691 (86.5) | 1962 (100.0) | <0.001 |
| Non-standard workers | 709 (25.8) | 1846 (74.2) | 2555 (100.0) | ||
| Total | 980 (20.3) | 3537 (79.7) | 4517 (100.0) | ||
Data were analyzed using Pearson’s χ2 test, p < 0.05.