Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 8;10(9):1268. doi: 10.3390/nu10091268

Table 2.

Mean portion sizes selected by FoPL (N = 25,772).

Nutri-Score MTL ENL No Label Pairwise Comparisons between FoPLs a
Overall Nutri-Score vs. MTL Nutri-Score vs. ENL Nutri-Score vs. no label MTL vs. ENL MTL vs. No Label ENL vs. No Label
Sweet biscuits 1.99 ± 1.72 2.02 ± 1.71 2.16 ± 1.78 2.18 ± 1.80 <0.0001 0.001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.4
Cheese 2.19 ± 1.68 2.23 ± 1.69 2.27 ± 1.71 2.39 ± 1.76 <0.0001 0.0003 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Sweet spreads 1.79 ± 1.56 1.91 ± 1.73 2.05 ± 1.78 1.94 ± 1.70 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.005 <0.0001
All food categories 1.99 ± 1.66 2.05 ± 1.71 2.16 ± 1.76 2.17 ± 1.77 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.6

ap-values from pairwise comparisons between FoPLs, using Kruskall-Wallis tests. p-value < 0.0001 was considered significant. MTL: Multiple Traffic Lights; ENL: Evolved Nutrition Label.