Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 21;6(3):74. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6030074

Table 3.

Correspondence between traditional serotyping (TS) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis of isolates of O26 (n = 71), O103 (n = 62), O111 (n = 17), and O157 (n = 50) initially serogrouped by PCR.

Serogroup #Clusters 1 #(%) NT 2 Isolates #(%) PCR Mismatch TS Serogroup #PCR and TS Matching Isolates Isolates Where PCR and Traditional Serotyping Matched Serogroup
#Isolates Within Serogroup-Specific Clusters
   #Unique Isolates
O26:NM O26:H9 O26:H11 O26:H32
O26 12 5(7.0) 29 (40.8) 42 11/23 1/3 2/6 1/3 17 (40.4)
O103:NM O103:H2 O103:H6 3 O103:H7 O103:H8 O103:H14 O103:H19
O103 12 2(3.2) 2 (3.2) 58 4/14 8/11 1/1 0/3 4/4 2/4 0/1 22 (37.9)
O103:H21 O103:H25 O103:H38 O103:H43
6/10 0/1 2/6 0/1
O111:NM O111:H8
O111 4 3(17.6) 0 (0) 14 5/6 8/8 0 (0)
O157:NM O157:H7 O157:H12 O157:H29
O157 7 2(4.0) 6(12.0) 42 3/5 24/29 0/2 0/2 9 (21.4)

1 Clusters where isolates show a minimum of 90% similarity. 2 NT, not typeable by traditional serotyping. 3 Isolate clustered with non-motile (NM) isolate.