Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 30;37(11):2577–2593. doi: 10.1002/jum.14616

Table 2.

Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography: Success Rates of Obtaining 9 Fetal Echocardiographic Views After Applying Intelligent Navigation to 100 Normal STIC Volume Data Sets Using Diagnostic Planes and/or VIS‐Assistance

Diagnostic Plane (n = 100) VIS‐Assistance (n = 100) Diagnostic Plane and/or VIS‐Assistance (n = 100)
Fetal Echocardiographic View n (%) 95% CIa n (%) 95% CIa n (%) 95% CIa
1. 4‐chamber 97 (97) 91–99 100 (100) 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
2. 5‐chamber 99 (99) 94–>99.9 100 (100) 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
3. LVOT 99 (99) 94–>99.9 100 (100) 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
4. Short axis view of great vessels/RVOT 97 (97) 91–99 100 (100) 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
5. 3VT 99 (99) 94–>99.9 100 (100) 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
6. Abdomen/stomach 100 (100)b 96–100 100 (100)c 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
7. Ductal arch 95 (95) 95–100 100 (100) 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
8. Aortic arch 98 (98) 95–100 100 (100) 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
9. SVC/IVC 94 (94) 95–100 100 (100) 96–100 100 (100) 96–100
• SVC 97 (97) 91–99
• IVC 97 (97) 91–99

CI indicates confidence interval; IVC, inferior vena cava; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; SVC, superior vena cava; and 3VT, 3 vessels and trachea.

a

The Wald method was used to calculate 2‐sided CIs for proportions expressed in the table; as the true proportion cannot exceed 100%, upper confidence limits are truncated at 100%.

b

Defined as visualization of the stomach in the diagnostic plane.

c

Defined as visualization of both the stomach and 4‐chamber view in VIS‐Assistance (to determine situs).