Skip to main content
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management logoLink to Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
. 2018 Sep 26;14:1765–1788. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S174864

A multicentric pharmacovigilance study: collection and analysis of adverse drug reactions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients

Agnese Gugliandolo 1, Federica Longo 1, Maria Giovanna Marrosu 2, Giovanni Luigi Mancardi 3,4, Ilaria Gandoglia 3, Maurizio Melis 5, Fabrizio Lo Giudice 1, Placido Bramanti 1, Emanuela Mazzon 1,
PMCID: PMC6165854  PMID: 30310286

Abstract

Purpose

We performed a pharmacovigilance study of 10 drugs used in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS). Our aim was to provide an overview of the safety of these drugs by the evaluation of reported expected and unexpected adverse reactions.

Patients and methods

We collected and analyzed adverse drug reactions from RR-MS patients belonging to four hospitals in three Italian regions, for a period of 24 months.

Results

We received a total of 411 adverse reactions, of which 84.18% were expected and only 15.82% were unexpected. We found no correlation between the number of reported adverse reactions and the route of administration (injectable/intravenous drugs N=224, oral drugs N=187). However, oral agents have caused a greater number of unexpected moderate-to-severe adverse reactions while, in injectable and infusion therapies, they have been evaluated as mild–moderate adverse reactions.

Conclusion

Our results underscore the importance of monitoring the safety profile of multiple sclerosis therapies, with particular attention to oral agents that have been introduced later in the clinical practice.

Keywords: pharmacovigilance, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, adverse drug reaction, disease-modifying therapy, safety

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), affecting more than 2.3 million people in the world, with a predominance in women (female:male ratio 2:1, but some reports also indicated 3:1).13 This disease is associated with different symptoms, depending on the location of the areas of demyelination in the CNS. The most frequent symptoms are as follows: fatigue, pain, bladder and bowel dysfunctions, visual problems, depression, spasticity, sexual dysfunctions, and movement and coordination problems.

Relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS) is the most common MS form. About 85% of people have initially this form, characterized by symptomatic attacks (relapses) followed by partial or total recovery (remissions).2 In most patients, the disease develops gradually into a chronic progressive phase, characterized by continuous accumulation of neurological impairments. Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are used with the purpose to prevent or reduce the number of relapses occurring in RR-MS and delay the progression of the disease.

DMTs include injectable drugs (interferon β-1a Avonex® [IFN β-1a-A], interferon β-1a Rebif® [IFN β-1a-R], interferon β-1b Betaferon® [IFN β-1b-B], interferon β-1b Extavia® [IFN β-1b-E], peginterferon β-1a [PEG IFN β-1a], and glatiramer acetate [GA]), intravenous therapies (natalizumab [NAT]), and oral agents (fingolimod [FTY720], teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate [DMF]).

All of these drugs showed immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, although using various mechanisms of action (MOAs). Interferons (IFNs) β exert their effect by promoting the anti-inflammatory cytokines, the inhibition of T-cell proliferation, and the reduction of inflammatory cell migration across the blood–brain barrier (BBB).4

The monoclonal antibody NAT inhibits leukocyte migration into the CNS, attenuating inflammation.5

GA is composed of synthetic peptides that simulate sequences of myelin, preventing the attack by immune system against this protein.6

Teriflunomide reduces the proliferation of T and B cells.7 Similarly, FTY720 is also able to reduce the number of circulating lymphocytes and to inhibit their migration into the CNS.8 DMF protects neuronal cells reducing oxidative stress and activating Nrf2.9 The characteristics and MOAs of each drug are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Details about the drugs considered in this study

Drug Commercial name and manufacturer Characteristics and mechanism of action References
IFN β-1a-A Avonex®; Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA Avonex is glycosylated like natural IFN β and exerts its biological actions through the binding to specific receptors on cell surface that starts a cascade of intracellular events leading to the expression of numerous genes and markers, such as MHC Class I, Mx protein, 2″/5′-oligoadenylate synthetase, β2-microglobulin, and neopterin 14
IFN β-1a-R Rebif®; Merck Serono, Darmstadt, Germany Rebif presents the same amino acid sequence of endogenous human IFN β. It is produced in mammalian cells (Chinese hamster ovary) and is glycosylated such as the natural protein 15
IFN β-1b-B IFN β-1b-E Betaferon®; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany Extavia®; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland The biological actions of IFN β-1b are mediated by its binding to specific receptors on the cell surface that triggers the expression of gene products that mediates its biological actions. IFN β-1b both decreases the binding affinity and enhances the internalization and degradation of the IFN γ receptor. IFN β-1b also enhances the suppressor activity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells 16, 17
PEG IFN β-1a Plegridy®; Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA Plegridy is an IFN β-1a conjugated with a single, linear molecule of methoxy poly(ethyleneglycol)-O-2-methylpropionaldehyde. It binds to the type I IFN receptor on the cell surface inducing a cascade of intracellular events leading to the regulation of IFN-responsive gene expression. Biological effects may include upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines, downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and inhibition of activated T cells’ migration across the blood–brain barrier 18
GA Copaxone®; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Petach Tikva, Israel GA is a pool of synthetic peptides that simulate sequences of myelin and then acts as a false target preventing the immune system attack against this protein 6, 19
NAT Tysabri®; Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA NAT is a recombinant humanized anti-α4-integrin antibody produced in a murine cell line by recombinant DNA technology. Its binding to the integrin blocks the interaction with its endothelial receptor, the VCAM-1, leading to the inhibition of leukocyte migration into the CNS and attenuating inflammation 5, 20
Teriflunomide Aubagio®; Sanofi, Paris, France Teriflunomide has anti-inflammatory properties that reversibly inhibits the mitochondrial enzyme DHO-DH, required for the pyrimidine synthesis. The result is that teriflunomide reduces the proliferation of dividing cells that need the synthesis of pyrimidine. In this way, teriflunomide reduces the proliferation of T and B cells 7, 22
FTY720 Gilenya®; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland FTY720 is a S1P receptor modulator. After the action of sphingosine kinase, the active metabolite FTY720 phosphate binds to S1P receptor 1 located on lymphocytes and crosses the blood–brain barrier to bind to S1P receptor 1 located on neural cells in the CNS. Acting as an antagonist of S1P receptors on lymphocytes, FTY720 phosphate inhibits the exit of lymphocytes from lymph nodes, causing a redistribution. It reduces the infiltration of lymphocytes into the CNS 8, 21
DMF Tecfidera®; Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA DMF exerts a cytoprotective effect on neuronal cells by activating the Nrf2 9, 23

Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; DHO-DH, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; DMF, dimethyl fumarate; FTY720, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; IFN, interferon; IFN β-1a-A, interferon β-1a Avonex®; IFN β-1a-R, interferon β-1a Rebif®; IFN β-1b-B, interferon β-1b Betaferon®; IFN β-1b-E, interferon β-1b Extavia®; NAT, natalizumab; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; PEG IFN β-1a, peginterferon β-1a; S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.

Based on their marketing authorization and their individual risk–benefit profile, MS drugs can be categorized into first- and second-line treatments. IFNs β and GA, as well as DMF and teriflunomide, are adopted as first-line therapies. In case of unsatisfactory response or safety issues with these drugs, the treatment can turn to second-line therapies, such as NAT and FTY720.10 This distinction does not coincide perfectly in different countries. For example, FTY720 is approved as a first-line treatment in the United States, while it is labeled as a second-line drug in the European Union.11

The efficacy and the safety profile of these therapies vary from a moderate efficacy and high safety of first-line drugs to a higher efficacy closely associated with an increased safety risk of second-line treatments. In a previous study, both oral and injectable DMTs were reported to be well tolerated.12 Among the oral agents, FTY720 presents more safety issues, requiring the monitoring of infections, cancers, lymphocyte, and levels of liver enzymes.13

In this scenario, pharmacovigilance becomes a fundamental source for the acquisition of new data, in order to deepen and constantly update the drug safety profile. Indeed, safety problems of some therapies only became evident during extension and postmarketing studies. This means that a more precise benefit–risk ratio is possible when a postmarketing surveillance is performed.

This postmarketing observational study shows the results of a multicentric pharmacovigilance program, sponsored by the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA). The aim of this study was to analyze expected and unexpected adverse drug reactions in RR-MS patients treated with DMTs, in order to evaluate their safety profile.

Patients and methods

We performed a multicentric study involving three Italian regions (Liguria, Sicily, and Sardinia) for a duration of 24 months. Specifically, we collected adverse drug reaction reports from RR-MS patients belonging to four hospitals, of which two hospitals are located in Cagliari, one hospital is located in Messina, and one hospital is located in Genoa.

We monitored the following drugs: IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B, IFN β-1b-E, PEG IFN β-1a, GA, NAT, FTY720, teriflunomide, and DMF.

For each patient reporting adverse drug reactions, we collected personal data (age and sex) and medical history. Specifically, we recorded the presence of any comorbidities, previous MS therapies, and the number of doses taken before the adverse reaction onset.

All the reports received during our study were analyzed in order to evaluate the expected and unexpected adverse reactions occurred. In particular, an adverse drug reaction refers to an injury caused by taking a drug and we considered as expected any adverse effect already listed on the summary of product characteristics available on European Medicines Agency (EMA) and AIFA websites.1423 On the contrary, we assessed an event as unexpected if it was not consistent with the drug product information.

Finally, all the adverse reactions were classified in relation to the degree of intensity. We decided to consider “severe” any serious interference with the daily activity performance that required medical intervention/therapy and may need hospitalization; “moderate” any mild or moderate interference with the daily activity performance that could need a minimal medical intervention/therapy; and “mild” each event causing no interference with the daily activity performance and requiring no medical intervention/therapy.

Approval for this study is not required because it was authorized by AIFA and supported by funds from the pharmacovigilance multiregional project. Nevertheless, the privacy of all patients was guaranteed.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the GraphPad Prism Version 6.0 program (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance was measured by chi-squared test. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The cohort examined in the four hospitals participating in this study was composed of 6,039 RR-MS patients. We received 265 adverse drug reaction reports from RR-MS patients (205 women and 60 men; average age 42.06±10.33 years). The distribution of RR-MS patients reporting adverse reactions in relation to age and sex is reported in Figures 1 and 2. Many subjects reported more than one adverse event, and for this reason, we have collected 411 reactions. Among these, 346 reactions have already been associated with the monitored drugs (Table 2 and Figure 3), while 65 reactions were unexpected (Table 3 and Figure 3). We observed that the choice to discontinue the therapy was mainly driven by the adverse reaction severity, even when the treatment was effective in improving the patient condition.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(AD) Distribution of RR-MS population reporting adverse reactions treated with interferons, in relation to age and sex.

Abbreviations: F, female; IFN β-1a-A, interferon β-1a Avonex®; IFN β-1a-R, interferon β-1a Rebif®; IFN β-1b-B, interferon β-1b Betaferon®; M, male; RR-MS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(AE) Distribution of RR-MS population reporting adverse reactions in relation to age and sex.

Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; RR-MS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Table 2.

Clinical data of RR-MS patients and adverse event characteristics for all the reported expected reactions

Drug Medical history of the patient
Characteristics of the adverse event
Concomitant diseases Previous therapy Number of doses Adverse event Severity Action taken
IFN β-1a-A No No 192 Myalgia Mild Continuation
Arthralgia Mild
No Steroids 384 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
Mixed anxiety-depressive disorder Mild
Hashimoto thyroiditis No 180 Leukopenia Severe Discontinuation
No No 104 Nephrotic syndrome Severe Discontinuation
No No 104 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
Pruritus Mild
Dyslipidemia, anxiety Methylprednisolone 308 Injection site necrosis Severe Temporary
Diarrhea Severe discontinuation
No No 886 Flu-like symptoms Mild Discontinuation
No No 260 Pain Mild Continuation
Headache No 17 Hepatic transaminases increased Moderate Discontinuation
Thyroiditis, headache, mitral insufficiency No 68 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Discontinuation
Hypertension No NA Injection site bruising Moderate Continuation
No No NA Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
No No 468 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
No No NA Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
No No 52 Myalgia Mild Continuation
Arthralgia Mild
Diabetes type 1 No 1 Vomiting Mild Continuation
No No 52 Malaise Moderate Discontinuation
Tachycardia Moderate
No No NA Pyrexia Mild Continuation
No No 4 Pyrexia Mild Continuation
Diabetes No 104 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
No No NA Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
No No 52 Flu-like symptoms Mild Discontinuation
IFN β-1a-R Hashimoto thyroiditis Steroids, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone, Methotrexate, IFN β-1a-R, Methylprednisolone 2,016 Urticaria Severe Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A 2,000 Arthralgia Moderate Discontinuation
Diabetes type 1, thyroiditis No 234 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Osteoporosis No 90 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
No Azathioprine 1,407 Injection site abscess Moderate Continuation
No No NA Insomnia Mild Continuation
No No 780 Musculoskeletal stiffness Moderate Discontinuation
Diabetes type 2, thyroiditis IFN β-1b-B 312 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Discontinuation
Depression No NA Headache Moderate Discontinuation
No No 312 Pyrexia Moderate Continuation
No No 36 Injection site pain Moderate Continuation
No No NA Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
No No 12 Pain in extremity Mild Continuation
Asthma No 24 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Discontinuation
No No 1,251 Hepatic transaminases increased Moderate Continuation
Diabetes No 468 Hepatic transaminases increased Moderate Continuation
No No 2,190 Hepatic transaminases increased Moderate Continuation
No No 75 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
Insomnia Mild
Hashimoto thyroiditis No 312 Injection site redness Mild Continuation
Glaucoma No 936 Headache Moderate Continuation
Neurofibromatosis type 1 No 36 Injection site necrosis Moderate Continuation
Flu-like symptoms Moderate
Hashimoto thyroiditis No 780 Headache Mild Continuation
No GA, NAT 468 Headache Moderate Discontinuation
Asthenia Moderate
No No NA Headache Moderate Discontinuation
Asthenia Moderate
Raynaud syndrome No NA Headache Moderate Continuation
Hashimoto thyroiditis No NA Headache Mild Continuation
Diabetes type 1, thyroiditis No 390 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Discontinuation
No No 468 Injection site erythema Moderate Continuation
IFN β-1b-B No IFN β-1a-A 1,900 Headache Mild Discontinuation
No No 1,800 Pyrexia Mild Discontinuation
Injection site pain Mild
Bipolar disorder GA, NAT, methylprednisolone 667 Injection site abscess Severe Discontinuation
Depression No NA Headache Moderate Discontinuation
Paresthesia Moderate
No No 1,460 Injection site mass Mild Discontinuation
No Cyclophosphamide 547 Gamma-glutamyl-transferase increased Moderate Discontinuation
No No 912 Asthenia Moderate Discontinuation
Myasthenia Moderate
No IFN β-1a-A 150 Pyrexia Moderate Continuation
Injection site pain Moderate
Methylprednisolone and ketoprofen allergies No 912 Malaise Moderate Continuation
Injection site pain Moderate
Vertigo No 273 Injection site pain Moderate Discontinuation
No No 273 Injection site mass Moderate Continuation
No No 912 Injection site skin reaction Moderate Discontinuation
No No 730 Injection site bruising Moderate Discontinuation
Injection site pain Moderate
Hypertension No NA Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
Thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A 105 Lymphopenia Moderate Discontinuation
IFN β-1b-E No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, GA 140 Abdominal pain Moderate Discontinuation
Depression, disk herniation No 135 Urticaria Mild Continuation
PEG IFN β-1a No Methylprednisolone 6 Flu-like symptoms Severe Continuation
Dysthyroidism, hypertension IFN β-1b-E, DMF, teriflunomide 10 Injection site rash Mild Discontinuation
No NA 8 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
No NA NA Flu-like symptoms NA NA
Anemia IFN β-1a-A NA Lymphopenia Mild Discontinuation
No NA 12 Lymphopenia Mild Discontinuation
No DMF 2 Urticaria Moderate Discontinuation
Depression IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1a-A 3 Injection site redness Mild Discontinuation
Diabetes IFN β-1a-A 2 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Injection site redness Moderate
Cardiopathy, capitellum fracture, duodeal ulcer, anxiety IFN β-1b-B 2 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Injection site redness Moderate
Allergies IFN β-1a-R 2 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Injection site rash Moderate
No IFN β-1b-B 2 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Meningioma IFN β-1b-B, Teriflunomide 4 Myalgia Mild Continuation
Arthralgia Mild
Depression IFN β-1b-B 4 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Injection site redness Moderate
No IFN β-1b-B 1 Arthralgia Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, mitoxantrone, GA, IFN β-1b-B, DMF 6 Lymphopenia Severe Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 1 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Injection site rash Moderate
Pulmonary valve stenosis IFN β-1a-R 2 Pyrexia Moderate Continuation
Injection site rash Moderate
No IFN β-1a-A 1 Injection site redness Moderate Continuation
No No 2 Injection site erythema Moderate Discontinuation
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency GA 4 Myalgia Moderate Continuation
Asthenia Moderate
No IFN β-1b-B, teriflunomide 4 Myalgia Mild Continuation
Arthralgia Mild
No No 6 Thrombocytopenia Moderate Discontinuation
Thyroiditis Mitoxantrone, IFN β-1a-R 10 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1b-B 1 Injection site redness Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A 6 Flu-like symptoms Mild Discontinuation
Thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A NA Injection site erythema Mild Continuation
Diabetes No 6 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A 6 Myalgia Mild Discontinuation
Urticaria Mild
No IFN β-1a-R NA Pyrexia Mild Continuation
Injection site redness Mild
No IFN β-1a-R, GA 10 Urticaria Moderate Discontinuation
Anxiety IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1b-B NA Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
Anxiety IFN β-1b-B 1 Pyrexia Moderate Continuation
Injection site necrosis Moderate
No Azathioprine, IFN β-1a-R 1 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R 26 Pyrexia Mild Continuation
No No 6 Flu-like symptoms Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R, mitoxantrone, IFN β-1b-B, IFN β-1a-A 6 Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R NA Injection site redness Moderate Continuation
No No NA Flu-like symptoms Moderate Continuation
Hepatic transaminases increased Moderate
No No 8 Pyrexia Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1b-B NA Asthenia Mild Continuation
Injection site redness Mild
No No 1 Pyrexia Mild Continuation
Injection site rash Mild
GA Hypercholesterolemia, anxiety No 620 Mixed anxiety-depressive disorder Moderate Discontinuation
No Methylprednisolone 48 Rash Moderate Discontinuation
Tachycardia Moderate
Depression Moderate
Allergic asthma No 2,002 Dyspnea Severe Continuation
Tachycardia Severe
Vomiting Severe
Hiatal hernia, contact dermatitis Methylprednisolone, IFN β-1b-E, DMF 60 Injection site rash Moderate Continuation
Hypercholesterolemia Methylprednisolone 140 Rash Severe Discontinuation
Flushing Severe
Choking sensation Severe
Anxiety IFN β-1b-B, NAT, DMF, teriflunomide 90 Chest pain Moderate Discontinuation
Flushing Moderate
Syncope Moderate
Gastroesophageal reflux disease, depression No 51 Injection site rash Mild Continuation
Anxiety IFN β-1b-B 93 Choking sensation Severe Discontinuation
Hypersensitivity Severe
No IFN β-1b-B, NAT NA Urticaria Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-A NA Urticaria Moderate Discontinuation
Tachycardia Moderate
Anxiety Moderate
No IFN β-1a-R NA Injection site mass Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A NA Injection site pruritus Mild Continuation
No No NA Injection site pain Moderate Continuation
Injection site mass Moderate
Dyspnea Moderate
Influenza Moderate
Palpitation Moderate
No No NA Injection site redness Moderate Continuation
Injection site mass Moderate
No No 1,567 Skin disorder Moderate Discontinuation
Pituitary microadenoma IFN β-1a-A 6 Injection site rash Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B 36 Influenza Moderate Discontinuation
Thyroiditis IFN β-1a-R 238 Injection site mass Mild Continuation
Pneumonia with autoimmune features DMF, PEG IFN β-1a 16 Rash Moderate Discontinuation
No No 67 Injection site mass Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A 1 Anxiety Moderate Continuation
Vomiting Moderate
Visual field defect Moderate
Dyspnea Moderate
Confusional state Moderate
No Azathioprine, IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 628 Pyrexia Moderate Discontinuation
Nausea Moderate
Chest pain Moderate
Myoclonic epilepsy IFN β-1a-R 63 Hypersensitivity Moderate Discontinuation
Depression, diabetes type 2, glaucoma No 160 Rash Moderate Discontinuation
Dyspnea Moderate
No IFN β-1b-B 2 Pyrexia Moderate Discontinuation
Rash Moderate
Motor dysfunction Moderate
Thyroiditis No 238 Hypersensitivity Moderate Discontinuation
NAT No No 52 Pyrexia Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1b-B, GA, IFN β-1a-A 104 Pyrexia Mild Continuation
No NA 3 Pyrexia Moderate Discontinuation
Chest pain Moderate
FTY720 Bronchial asthma, allergies Methylprednisolone, IFN β-1a-A, GA, IFN β-1b-B 1,095 Headache Moderate Discontinuation
Pruritus Moderate
Urinary tract infection Moderate
Hypercholesterolemia Methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine 240 Hepatic enzyme increased Severe Temporary
Influenza Severe discontinuation
Headache Severe
Peripheral edema Severe
Neurogenic bladder Methylprednisolone, azathioprine, IFN β-1b-E, IFN β-1a-A 730 Alopecia Moderate Discontinuation
Diabetes type 1, thyroiditis Steroids, IFN β-1a-R, Methylprednisolone, NAT 120 Asthenia Moderate Continuation
No No 75 Headache Mild Continuation
No GA 270 Hepatic enzyme increased Mild NA
No IFN β-1a-A 120 Hepatic enzyme increased Moderate Temporary discontinuation
Hashimoto thyroiditis GA, Azathioprine 547 Lymphopenia Moderate Continuation
Panic attacks, hyperandrogenism, retinal detachment No 1,460 Candidiasis Moderate Continuation
No GA 365 Leukopenia Severe Temporary discontinuation
No IFN β-1b-B 365 Hepatic enzyme increased Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-R, NAT, IFN β-1b-B 455 Basal cell carcinoma Moderate Discontinuation
Teriflunomide Autoimmune thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 510 Musculoskeletal pain Mild Continuation
No Steroids 970 Alopecia Mild Continuation
Respiratory tract infection Mild
Neurogenic bladder, gastroduodenal ulcer Aminopyridine, IFN β-1a-A, methylprednisolone 365 Asthenia Severe Continuation
Arthralgia Severe
Alopecia Severe
Aniridia DMF NA Hepatic transaminases increased Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R 89 Leukopenia Mild Continuation
Mixed anxiety-depressive disorder IFN β-1a-A 540 Hypertension Moderate Temporary discontinuation
No No 35 Hepatic transaminases increased Mild Continuation
Ebstein anomaly IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1b-B, IFN β-1a-R, NAT 30 Musculoskeletal pain Moderate Discontinuation
Osgood–Schlatter disease IFN β-1a-R 7 Hypertension Moderate Discontinuation
Panic attacks GA 10 Gastroenteritis Moderate Discontinuation
Headache Moderate
Pain Moderate
Panic attacks, thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 7 Abdominal pain upper Moderate Continuation
Nausea Moderate
Asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease Azathioprine, IFN β-1a-A, mitoxantrone, GA, immunoglobulins, IFN β-1b-B, NAT, FTY720 365 Alopecia Moderate Discontinuation
Diarrhea Moderate
Depression, neonatal asphyxia, intellectual disability IFN β-1a-A 30 Diarrhea Mild Continuation
Autoimmune thyroiditis IFN β-1a-R, GA, azathioprine 30 Alopecia Moderate Discontinuation
Diarrhea Moderate
Weight decrease Moderate
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 90 Alopecia Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R, mitoxantrone, IFN β-1b-E 547 Hypertension Moderate Temporary discontinuation
Disk herniation No 60 Hypertension Moderate Continuation
Anxiety, pain in extremity GA NA Gastroenteritis Moderate Continuation
Headache Moderate
Pain Moderate
Gastroesophageal reflux disease GA, IFN β-1b-B 182 Hepatic transaminases increased Severe Discontinuation
Autoimmune thyroiditis Azathioprine, IFN β-1a-R 90 Hypertension Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1b-B 16 Rash Moderate Discontinuation
Diabetes type 2, thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A 365 Gastroenteritis Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1a-A 60 Hypertension Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-R, mitoxantrone, GA 60 Alopecia Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R, GA 60 Pancreatitis Moderate Temporary discontinuation
Depression IFN β-1b-B 730 Hypertension Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, GA, azathioprine 90 Neutropenia Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-R 365 Diarrhea Mild Continuation
Autoimmune thyroiditis IFN β-1a-R 365 Alopecia Moderate Continuation
Diarrhea Moderate
No IFN β-1a-A 365 Alopecia Mild Continuation
Pancreatitis Mild
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 240 Alopecia Mild Continuation
Autoimmune thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A, GA 30 Abdominal pain upper Mild Continuation
Panic attacks, thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 547 Nausea Moderate Discontinuation
Abdominal pain upper Moderate
Diarrhea Moderate
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R NA Diarrhea Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, GA, DMF NA Abdominal pain upper Moderate Discontinuation
Diarrhea Moderate
Hepatic transaminases increased Moderate
No No 912 Abdominal pain upper Mild Discontinuation
Nausea Mild
DMF No Steroids, IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, GA 410 Abdominal pain upper Mild Continuation
Flushing Mild
Pruritus Mild
No GA, IFN β-1a-A, teriflunomide 210 Abdominal pain upper Mild Continuation
Flushing Mild
Burning sensation Mild
No Steroids 720 Flushing Moderate Temporary
Pruritus Moderate discontinuation
Hepatic transaminases increased Moderate
No Methylprednisolone, IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 900 Flushing Mild Continuation
Rash Mild
No No 25 Abdominal pain Moderate Discontinuation
Diarrhea Moderate
No IFN β-1b-B, methotrexate 450 Gastrointestinal disorder Mild Continuation
Neurogenic bladder IFN β-1a-R 180 Rash Severe Discontinuation
Myastenia, meningioma IFN β-1a-R, GA 300 Lymphopenia Moderate Temporary discontinuation
No No 420 Drug-induced liver injury Severe Discontinuation
Anxiety IFN β-1a-R 180 Diarrhea Severe Discontinuation
Abdominal pain Severe
No No 30 Abdominal pain Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1b-B, IFN β-1a-A 30 Gastrointestinal disorder Mild Continuation
Hashimoto thyroiditis IFN β-1a-R 14 Flushing Mild Continuation
No FTY720 2 Abdominal pain Moderate Discontinuation
Flushing Moderate
Diabetes type 2, thyroiditis IFN β-1b-B 180 Abdominal pain Moderate Discontinuation
Flushing Moderate
Headache, primary fibromyalgia IFN β-1a-R, GA 60 Asthenia Moderate Discontinuation
No No NA Pruritus Mild Continuation
Flushing Mild
No IFN β-1a-R 40 Rash Moderate Continuation
No No 960 Flushing Moderate Continuation
Panic attacks, claustrophobia, thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1b-B, NAT NA Rash Moderate Discontinuation
No GA 1,094 Flushing Moderate Continuation
Depression IFN β-1a-A, NAT 60 Pruritus Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-R, GA 365 Flushing Moderate Continuation
Nausea Moderate
Autoimmune thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A 30 Gastroenteritis Severe Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-A NA Flushing Mild Continuation
Diarrhea Mild
Hypertension, epilepsy IFN β-1a-R 30 Diarrhea Severe Discontinuation
No No NA Abdominal pain upper Moderate Continuation
Flushing Moderate
Autoimmune thyroiditis IFN β-1b-B 730 Abdominal pain upper Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1b-B 60 Gastrointestinal disorder Moderate Discontinuation
Multinodular goiter IFN β-1a-R NA Flushing Mild Continuation
Gastrointestinal disorder Mild
Autoimmune thyroiditis IFN β-1b-E NA Flushing Mild Continuation
Hepatitis B IFN β-1a-A, NAT NA Flushing Moderate Continuation
Hashimoto thyroiditis, psoriasis IFN β-1b-B, GA 60 Gastrointestinal disorder Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1b-B 900 Flushing Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R 240 Flushing Moderate Continuation
Pruritus Moderate
Psoriasis No 730 Flushing Moderate Continuation
No GA 60 Gastrointestinal disorder Mild Discontinuation
No No 420 Flushing Mild Continuation
Diarrhea Mild
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1b-B, mitoxantrone, GA 60 Flushing Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R NA Flushing Mild Continuation
Abdominal pain Mild
No IFN β-1b-B 730 Flushing Mild Continuation
Hashimoto thyroiditis IFN β-1b-B 120 Flushing Mild Continuation
Abdominal pain Mild
Anxiety, depression IFN β-1b-B, IFN β-1a-R, GA, teriflunomide 240 Hepatic transaminases increased Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-A 180 Flushing Mild Continuation
Thyroiditis IFN β-1b-B, FTY720 300 Flushing Moderate Discontinuation
Lymphopenia Moderate
Hypertension No 180 Flushing Mild Continuation
No GA, IFN β-1a-R 60 Flushing Mild Continuation
Gastrointestinal disorder Mild
Hypertension No 60 Flushing Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A 480 Lymphopenia Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-R 240 Flushing Moderate Continuation
Pruritus Moderate
No IFN β-1b-B NA Flushing Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A 60 Nausea Moderate Discontinuation
Gastrointestinal disorder Moderate
Abdominal pain Moderate
No IFN β-1a-R NA Flushing Moderate Continuation
Diarrhea Moderate
No No NA Flushing Mild Continuation

Abbreviations: DMF, dimethyl fumarate; FTY720, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; IFN β-1a-A, interferon β-1a Avonex®; IFN β-1a-R, interferon β-1a Rebif®; IFN β-1b-B, interferon β-1b Betaferon®; IFN β-1b-E, interferon β-1b Extavia®; NAT, natalizumab; PEG IFN β-1a, peginterferon β-1a; RR-MS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; NA, not available.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Total expected and unexpected adverse events for each drug evaluated.

Notes: **P<0.01. ***P<0.001. ****P<0.0001.

Abbreviations: DMF, dimethyl fumarate; FTY720, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; IFN β-1a-A, interferon β-1a Avonex®; IFN β-1a-R, interferon β-1a Rebif®; IFN β-1b-B, interferon β-1b Betaferon®; IFN β-1b-E, interferon β-1b Extavia®; NAT, natalizumab; PEG IFN β-1a, peginterferon β-1a.

Table 3.

Clinical data of RR-MS patients and adverse event characteristics for all the reported unexpected reactions

Drug Medical history of the patient
Characteristics of the adverse event
Concomitant diseases Previous therapy Number of doses Adverse event Severity Action taken
IFN β-1a-A Dyslipidemia, anxiety Methylprednisolone 308 Erectile dysfunction Severe Temporary discontinuation
No No 4 Irritable mood Moderate Discontinuation
IFN β-1a-R Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome No 1,251 Erectile dysfunction Mild Discontinuation
No No 1,095 Panic attacks Moderate Discontinuation
Tachycardia Moderate
No No NA Nervousness Moderate Discontinuation
IFN β-1b-E No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, GA 140 Rachialgia Moderate Discontinuation
Peginterferon β-1a Dysthyroidism, hypertension IFN β-1b-E, DMF, Teriflunomide 10 Unmotivated anger Mild Discontinuation
No NA NA Localized erythema NA NA
No DMF 2 Eyelid edema Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1b-B 1 Abdominal pain Moderate Continuation
Diarrhea Moderate
Confusional state Moderate
No No 1 Oral aphthae Mild Continuation
GA No No 2,555 Vertigo Moderate Continuation
Postural instability Moderate
Right hemiparesis Mild
Allergic asthma No 2,002 Tachypnea Severe Continuation
Anxiety No 67 Panic attacks Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B 36 Panic attacks Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-A 1,099 Panic attacks Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-R 940 Irritable mood Mild Continuation
NAT No GA 36 Femoral fracture Severe Discontinuation
Diabetes type 1 Methylprednisolone 29 Paresthesia Mild Continuation
Hyposthenia Mild
Mixed anxiety-depressive disorder, conversion disorder GA 34 Bronchopneumonia Moderate Continuation
No IFN β-1b-B, GA, IFN β-1a-A 104 Cough Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1b-B 109 Diarrhea Moderate Continuation
No NA 3 Cough Moderate Discontinuation
Fingolimod Depression IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1b-E 560 Aortic dissection leading to death Severe NA
No IFN β-1a-A 605 Warts Severe Discontinuation
Hypotyroidism Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, mitoxantrone 1,440 Insomnia Severe Continuation
Behavioral disorder Severe
Bronchial asthma, allergies Methylprednisolone, IFN β-1a-A, GA, IFN β-1b-B 1,095 Pain in extremity Moderate Discontinuation
Muscle spasms Moderate
Neurogenic bladder Methylprednisolone, azathioprine, IFN β-1b-E, IFN β-1a-A 730 Pain in extremity Moderate Discontinuation
Diabetes type 1, thyroiditis Steroids, IFN β-1a-R, methylprednisolone, NAT 120 Arthralgia Moderate Continuation
Insomnia Moderate
Acne DMF 52 Acne worsening Moderate Continuation
Cervical spine trauma No 70 Chest pain Moderate Continuation
No No 75 Anxiety Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 60 Hypotyroidism Moderate Continuation
Depression Azathioprine, IFN β-1a-R 1,825 Bilateral ovarian carcinoma Severe Discontinuation
Teriflunomide No No 390 Depression Moderate Discontinuation
Neurogenic bladder, gastroduodenal ulcer Aminopyridine, IFN β-1a-A, methylprednisolone 365 Chest pain Severe Continuation
Herpes zoster Severe
Ebstein anomaly IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1b-B, IFN β-1a-R, NAT 30 Tachycardia Moderate Discontinuation
Asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease Azathioprine, IFN β-1a-A, mitoxantrone, GA, immunoglobulins, IFN β-1b-B, NAT, FTY720 365 Pruritus Moderate Discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-R, mitoxantrone, IFN β-1b-E 547 Tachycardia Moderate Temporary discontinuation
No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, NAT 60 Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy Severe Discontinuation
DMF No IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R 160 Thrombocytosis Mild Continuation
No IFN β-1b-B, IFN β-1a-A 900 Insomnia Mild Continuation
Neurogenic bladder IFN β-1a-R 180 Headache Severe Discontinuation
Petrous apex cholesterol granuloma IFN β-1a-R 300 Omphalitis Moderate Discontinuation
Headache, primary fibromyalgia IFN β-1a-R, GA 60 Pain Moderate Discontinuation
No No 60 Headache Moderate Discontinuation
Respiratory failure Moderate
No GA 1,094 Vertigo Moderate Continuation
Rhinitis Moderate
No IFN β-1a-R, GA 365 Dyspnea Moderate Continuation
Vaginal discharge Moderate
Autoimmune thyroiditis IFN β-1a-A 30 Lymphadenopathy Severe Discontinuation
Hepatitis B IFN β-1a-A, NAT NA Weight decrease Moderate Continuation
Chest pain Moderate
No IFN β-1a-R 240 Vertigo Moderate Continuation

Abbreviations: DMF, dimethyl fumarate; GA, glatiramer acetate; IFN β-1a-A, interferon β-1a Avonex®; IFN β-1a-R, interferon β-1a Rebif®; IFN β-1b-B, interferon β-1b Betaferon®; IFN β-1b-E, interferon β-1b Extavia®; NAT, natalizumab; RR-MS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; NA, not available.

Some of the patients had received previously other therapies, as indicated in Tables 2 and 3. We can underline that the previous therapies included IFNs in most cases. On the contrary, almost all patients of our cohort treated with IFNs did not receive previous therapies, except for PEG IFN β-1a, in line with the fact that IFNs represent first-line treatment. Looking at the different therapies used, we can observe that the patients treated with three or more drugs showed mostly adverse events of moderate intensity. However, it was not possible to evaluate the influence of the sequence of different administered drugs on the appearance of the adverse reactions, because we had a small cohort of patients and dividing them on the bases of the sequence of drugs used caused a further fragmentation of patients in little groups, making difficult to reach a significant and valid result.

IFNs

In our study, about 42% of adverse drug reaction reports were attributed to IFNs. Specifically, we collected 154 adverse effects, among which only about 9% were unexpected. In relation to the severity degree, 5.84% were recorded as severe events.

IFN β-1a

We received 23 reports of IFN β-1a-A, involving patients in 30.43% of cases suffered from comorbidities. For the 23 reports received, 21 reported only expected adverse events (Table 2), one reported only unexpected reactions (Table 3), while the other one showed both expected and unexpected events (Tables 2 and 3). We recorded 30 adverse effects related to IFN β-1a-A (1.3 adverse drug reactions per report, Figure 3), of which two were unexpected (Figures 4 and 5). Specifically, these reactions were a moderate irritable mood and a severe erectile dysfunction (Table 3).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(AC) Expected adverse events divided on the bases of the severity grade.

Notes: *P<0.05. **P<0.01. ***P<0.001. ****P<0.0001.

Abbreviations: DMF, dimethyl fumarate; FTY720, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; IFN β-1a-A, interferon β-1a Avonex®; IFN β-1a-R, interferon β-1a Rebif®; IFN β-1b-B, interferon β-1b Betaferon®; IFN β-1b-E, interferon β-1b Extavia®; NAT, natalizumab; PEG IFN β-1a, peginterferon β-1a.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(AC) Unexpected adverse events divided on the bases of the severity grade.

Note: *P<0.05.

Abbreviations: DMF, dimethyl fumarate; FTY720, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; IFN β-1a-A, interferon β-1a Avonex®; IFN β-1a-R, interferon β-1a Rebif®; IFN β-1b-B, interferon β-1b Betaferon®; IFN β-1b-E, interferon β-1b Extavia®; NAT, natalizumab; PEG IFN β-1a, peginterferon β-1a.

In regard of expected adverse events, for IFN β-1a-A, the value was significantly higher compared to the expected adverse events with NAT and FTY720. In particular, we received a significantly lower number of expected adverse events of moderate grade compared to IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B, PEG IFN β-1a, GA, FTY720, teriflunomide, and DMF. On the contrary, the number of those of mild grade was significantly higher compared to the mild adverse events recorded for IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B, GA, FTY720, and teriflunomide (Figure 4).

Generally, the most common adverse effects during IFN β-1a-A therapy are flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions. Flu-like syndrome has also been frequently reported in our study (N=10) mainly of mild severity, and only in three cases, it was necessary to stop the drug administration. Injection site reactions were less common and recorded as a severe necrosis (N=1) leading to drug discontinuation and a moderate bruising (N=1).

General disorders induced by IFN β-1a-A were also collected, such as pyrexia (N=2), malaise (N=1), and pain (N=1), as well as musculoskeletal symptoms such as myalgia (N=2) and arthralgia (N=2). Other expected adverse events were as follows: vomiting (N=1), leukopenia (N=1), pruritus (N=1), diarrhea (N=1), tachycardia (N=1), mixed anxiety-depressive disorder (N=1), and hepatic transaminases increased (N=1). Finally, we recorded a severe nephrotic syndrome (N=1) reported by a 44-year-old female patient who had undergone 104 administrations before the reaction onset. This event is considered among the expected but rare adverse effect, and it resulted in the suspension of IFN β-1a-A.

From the reports received, it emerged that IFN β-1a-A was permanently discontinued in 34.78% of cases due to the adverse reactions, while in 4.35%, it was decided to suspend the treatment only temporarily. On the contrary, patients continued the drug administration in 60.87% of reports.

For IFN β-1a-R, we received 31 adverse drug reaction reports. Looking at expected adverse events, IFN β-1a-R showed a significantly higher number of reactions compared to NAT and FTY720. We observed only one expected adverse reaction of severe grade, showing a statistical significance compared to FTY720. The number of expected adverse reactions of moderate grade for IFN β-1a-R was significant compared to those for DMF and IFN β-1a-A. Those of mild grade were significantly higher compared to GA but lower compared to IFN β-1a-A (Figure 4).

In 48.38% of cases, patients reporting adverse events (Figure 1B) were affected by concomitant diseases (Tables 2 and 3).

We collected 36 adverse reactions related to IFN β-1a-R (1.2 adverse drug reactions per report), of which 32 adverse reactions were expected and four adverse reactions were unexpected (Figure 3). The most common adverse effects observed were flu-like symptoms (N=8) and headache (N=7). Injection site reactions were signaled in 16.12% of reports. In particular, these effects were reported as abscess (N=1), pain (N=1), redness (N=1), erythema (N=1), and necrosis (N=1) of mild–moderate intensity.

IFN β-1a-R is frequently associated with hepatic dysfunction, but in our study, transaminases’ elevation was reported a few times (N=3), as a moderate reaction never leads to drug discontinuation. General disorders were also observed, such as pyrexia (N=1) and asthenia (N=2), as well as musculoskeletal reactions of arthralgia (N=1), musculoskeletal stiffness (N=1), and pain in extremity (N=1). Moreover, we recorded mild insomnia (N=2) and severe urticaria (N=1).

Even a patient treated with IFN β-1a-R experienced an erectile dysfunction and following this adverse unexpected event, the drug was discontinued. The other recorded unexpected effects were all moderate and related to tachycardia (N=1), panic attacks (N=1), and nervousness (N=1).

Our evaluation showed that IFN β-1a-R was definitively discontinued in 35.48% of reports. The total number of unexpected adverse drug reactions for both IFN β-1a-A and IFN β-1a-R was significantly lower compared to NAT and FTY720 (Figure 3).

IFN β-1b

A total of 15 reports involving IFN β-1b-B were received in 24 months, 40% of which referred to subjects suffering from comorbidities (Tables 2 and 3).

We collected 21 adverse effects that were all expected (1.4 adverse drug reactions per report; Figure 3), a significantly higher number compared with expected adverse reactions for IFN β-1b-E, NAT, and FTY720. The most common referred to injection site reactions, found in 60% of reports, and described as pain (N=5), mass (N=2), bruising (N=1), skin reaction (N=1), and abscess (N=1) of mild–moderate intensity. Additionally, ~33.3% of cases were related to general disorders, such as flu-like symptoms (N=1), pyrexia (N=2), asthenia (N=1), and malaise (N=1). Moreover, headache (N=2), myasthenia (N=1), paresthesia (N=1), lymphopenia (N=1), and γ-glutamyl-transferase increased (N=1) were also recorded. Looking at the severity, only one severe expected reaction was received, with a significant difference compared to FTY720. Moderate grade expected reactions were significantly higher compared to those for IFN β-1a-A, while the number of those of mild grade was significantly lower compared to the same drug (Table 2, Figure 4).

Among the reports analyzed, 73.3% resolved to IFN β-1b-B discontinuation due to the adverse reaction onset.

IFN β-1b-E showed the lowest number of expected adverse events, and in particular only one of mild grade, a data statistically significant compared to GA. During our project, we received only two reports involving IFN β-1b-E. The first case was related to a subject with no concurrent disease who experienced a moderate abdominal pain and an unexpected moderate rachialgia, because of which the drug was discontinued. The other report involved a patient who suffered from depression and disk herniation as comorbidities and experienced an unexpected urticaria of mild severity not leading to drug discontinuation (Tables 2 and 3).

IFN β-1b-E showed a significant elevated number of unexpected adverse drug reactions compared to IFN β-1b-B (Figure 3).

PEG IFN β-1a

Among the different IFNs β, the highest number of reports we received was attributed to PEG IFN β-1a (N=42). The number of expected adverse events was significantly higher compared to those for NAT and FTY720. Regarding the severity grade, PEG IFN β-1a showed a significantly lower number of severe expected adverse events compared to those with GA and FTY720 but a significantly higher number of expected reactions of mild grade compared to the same therapies. The number of expected moderate reactions was significantly higher compared to IFN β-1a-A but lower compared to GA (Figure 4).

Patients reporting adverse effects suffered from concomitant diseases in 38% of cases (Tables 2 and 3).

We collected 64 adverse reactions (1.5 adverse drug reactions per report, Figure 3), of which 57 adverse reactions have previously been associated with PEG IFN β-1a (Figures 3 and 4 and Table 2) and seven adverse reactions were unexpected (Figures 3 and 5 and Table 3). Specifically, we noticed flu-like syndrome (N=17) in 40.47% of reports, with an intensity ranging from mild to severe. An equal percentage was related to mild–moderate injection site reactions, described as redness (N=9), rash (N=5), erythema (N=2), and necrosis (N=1). General disorders of pyrexia (N=6) and asthenia (N=2) also commonly occurred, as well as myalgia (N=4), arthralgia (N=3), urticaria (N=3), lymphopenia (N=3), and thrombocytopenia (N=1). Moreover, a moderate elevation of hepatic transaminases (N=1) was recorded.

All the reported unexpected reactions had a mild–moderate severity and referred to oral aphthae (N=1), eyelid edema (N=1), localized erythema (N=1), unmotivated anger (N=1), confusional state (N=1), diarrhea (N=1), and abdominal pain (N=1).

As a consequence of the adverse reaction onset, it was decided PEG IFN β-1a discontinuation in 26.83% of reports.

GA

A significantly higher number of expected adverse events were reported for GA compared to NAT and FTY720. The majority were of moderate grade. In particular, the number of moderate grade expected adverse reactions was significantly higher compared to those received with IFN β-1a-A, PEG IFN β-1a, and DMF. The number of mild reactions was significant compared to the received mild expected events for IFN β-1b-E and NAT and significantly lower compared to IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, PEG IFN β-1a, teriflunomide, and DMF. The number of expected adverse reactions of severe grade for GA was significantly higher compared to PEG β-1a (Figure 4).

We received 30 reports involving GA-treated patients who suffered from concurrent diseases in 46.6% of cases (Tables 2 and 3).

We counted an amount of 59 adverse reactions attributed to GA (two adverse drug reactions per report), 13.56% of which were unexpected (Table 3 and Figure 3). Particularly, ~33% of reports referred to reactions of moderate–severe grade, which occurred immediately after GA administration and mostly resolved within a day, such as rash (N=5), dyspnea (N=4), tachycardia (N=3), pyrexia (N=2), flushing (N=2), chest pain (N=2), choking sensation (N=2), anxiety (N=2), palpitation (N=1), syncope (N=1), vomiting (N=2), depression (N=1), nausea (N=1), confusional state (N=1), and visual field defect (N=1). Injection site reactions of mild–moderate severity were also common (30% of reports), and they manifested as mass (N=5), rash (N=3), pruritus (N=1), pain (N=1), and redness (N=1). In addition, moderate or severe hypersensitivity reactions (N=3) occurred after GA administration and, in all of these cases, the drug discontinuation was decided. The remaining expected events recorded were mixed anxiety-depressive disorder (N=1), influenza (N=2), urticaria (N=2), skin disorder of unspecified nature (N=1), and motor dysfunction (N=1).

The unexpected adverse reactions were significant compared to those received for NAT and FTY720. From our evaluation, we found that the unexpected events were mainly of moderate–severe degree and referred to panic attacks (N=3), tachypnea (N=1), and irritable mood (N=1). In addition, a patient reported vertigo and postural instability of moderate intensity, as well as a slight hemiparesis for ~5 months, which however did not result in drug discontinuation. Among the reports analyzed, 53.33% resulted in GA discontinuation due to the adverse reaction onset.

NAT

For NAT, we received a significantly lower number of expected adverse reactions compared to those recorded for IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B, PEG IFN β-1a, GA, teriflunomide, and DMF. In addition, the number of mild grade expected reactions was significant compared to those for GA (Figure 4).

We received seven reports from NAT-treated patients who have undergone 3–109 administrations (one infusion/month) at the time of adverse reaction onset. In particular, only two reports belonged to subjects who suffered from concomitant diseases: the first one was affected by diabetes and the other one showed mixed anxiety-depressive disorder and conversion disorder.

About 86% of reports included patients who received NAT for >24 months, a period after which the risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) increases. Nevertheless, no case of this infection was reported.

We collected 11 adverse drug reactions, mainly of mild–moderate severity (1.6 adverse drug reactions per report), 63.64% of which were unexpected (Figures 3 and 5 and Table 3). Specifically, we highlighted pyrexia (N=3) and chest pain (N=1) as expected reactions. Furthermore, we recorded unexpected events described as cough (N=2), femoral fracture (N=1), paresthesia (N=1), hyposthenia (N=1), diarrhea (N=1), and bronchopneumonia (N=1). The number of unexpected drug reactions was significantly higher compared to IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, and IFN β-1b-B. A significant difference was also recorded compared to GA and DMF. In particular, the mild ones were higher compared to FTY720 (Figure 5).

Finally, our analysis underlined that only two of the seven cases received have discontinued NAT following the adverse reaction onset.

Fingolimod

For FTY720, we received a significantly lower number of expected adverse reactions compared to IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B, PEG IFN β-1a, GA, teriflunomide, and DMF. In particular, the number of those of severe grade was significant compared to DMF, and it was significantly higher compared to those of teriflunomide, IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B, and PEG IFN β-1a. The reactions of moderate grade were significantly higher compared to IFN β-1a-A. On the contrary, the reactions of mild grade were significantly lower compared to IFN β-1a-A, PEG IFN β-1a, and DMF (Figure 4).

We received 19 reports involving FTY720-treated patients. A total of 57.89% of cases suffered from concomitant diseases (Tables 2 and 3).

We collected an amount of 31 adverse drug reactions attributed to FTY720 (1.6 adverse drug reactions per report), 45.16% of which were unexpected (Table 3 and Figure 3).

During FTY720 treatment, the elevation of hepatic enzymes is common and often causes drug discontinuation. In our study, increase in liver transaminases was also recorded (N=4), for which the temporary suspension of therapy was decided until these values have returned to the normal range.

The immunosuppressive effects of FTY720 may increase the risk of infections too, especially in reference to opportunistic ones. In our analysis, the reported infections were candidiasis (N=1), influenza (N=1), and urinary tract infection (N=1). Moreover, it is well known that FTY720 commonly reduces the number of circulating lymphocytes due to its MOA, but in our study, only one patient reported a moderate lymphopenia without leading to FTY720 discontinuation. However, other reactions related to the blood and lymphatic system have been observed, represented by leukopenia (N=1) and peripheral edema (N=1).

In clinical trials and in real-world practice, basal-cell carcinoma has been observed in FTY720-treated patients; for this reason, vigilance for skin lesions is strongly recommended. In our study, a case of this skin cancer was reported by a 48-year-old female patient treated with FTY720 for 15 months. This event was classified as moderate and led to drug discontinuation.

Finally, the remaining expected reactions recorded were headache (N=3), asthenia (N=1), alopecia (N=1), and pruritus (N=1).

The reported unexpected effects were mainly of moderate–severe intensity. The number of unexpected drug reactions was significant compared to IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b-B, PEG IFN β-1a, GA, teriflunomide and DMF (Figure 3). In particular, we observed psychiatric disorders, such as insomnia (N=2), behavioral disorder (N=1), and anxiety (N=1), as well as musculoskeletal adverse reactions given by pain in extremity (N=2), muscle spasms (N=1), and arthralgia (N=1). Isolated cases of warts (N=1), acne worsening (N=1), hypothyroidism (N=1), and chest pain (N=1) were also reported. In addition, a severe bilateral ovarian carcinoma and an aortic dissection, which led the patient to death, were noticed.

In 35.29% of reports, it was necessary to stop FTY720 administration permanently, while it was decided only a temporary suspension in 17.65% of reports. On the contrary, 47.06% of reports described the drug continuation even after the adverse reaction onset.

Teriflunomide

The number of expected adverse reactions was significantly higher compared to those for NAT and FTY720. The number of those of severe grade was significantly lower compared to FTY720. Reactions of moderate grade were significantly higher compared to IFN β-1a-A. The expected reactions of mild grade were higher compared to GA but lower compared to IFN β-1a-A (Figure 4). We received 38 reports involving teriflunomide-treated patients, 52.63% of which suffered from comorbidities (Tables 2 and 3).

Our analysis led to the registration of 61 adverse reactions (1.6 adverse drug reactions per report), 11.48% of which were unexpected (Table 3).

As already well known from the information available on this drug, gastrointestinal disorders are the most frequent adverse reactions reported by the majority of patients receiving teriflunomide. In our study, such events were recorded in 42.10% of reports and all of them had a mild–moderate severity grade. In particular, these subjects experienced diarrhea (N=8), abdominal pain upper (N=5), nausea (N=3), gastroenteritis (N=3), and pancreatitis (N=2).

Generally, teriflunomide has also been associated with the elevation of blood pressure and a decrease in leukocytes, as well as an increase in hepatic enzymes. For this reason, special precautions must be performed before and after teriflunomide treatment, which consist of assessing and monitoring of the following parameters: blood pressure, blood cells’ count, and hepatic function. In our analysis, we also observed hypertension (N=7), hepatic transaminases increased (N=4), leukopenia (N=1), and neutropenia (N=1). Alopecia (N=9) was another effect commonly reported in our project, and it was described mainly as a mild–moderate event. The remaining expected reactions recorded were headache (N=2), weight decrease (N=1), musculoskeletal pain (N=2), arthralgia (N=1), asthenia (N=1), pain (N=2), respiratory tract infection (N=1), and rash (N=1).

Finally, we noticed depression (N=1), chest pain (N=1), herpes zoster (N=1), tachycardia (N=2), and pruritus (N=1) as unexpected events, with an intensity grade ranging from moderate to severe. Strangely, a severe case of PML was also found, an infection that has not been associated with teriflunomide administration yet. No mild grade events were received.

In 39.47% of reports we received, it was decided definitively to discontinue teriflunomide; in 7.9%, the treatment was interrupted temporarily, whereas 52.63% described the continuation of this drug despite the adverse reaction onset.

DMF

For DMF, we received the highest number of expected adverse reactions, with a significant difference compared to NAT and FTY720. The number of those of severe grade was significant compared to FTY720. The moderate grade expected adverse reactions reached a statistical significance compared to IFN β-1a-A, IFN β-1a-R and GA. The mild adverse reactions were higher compared to GA and FTY720 (Figure 4). We received 58 reports attributed to DMF, involving patients who were affected by comorbidities in 37.93% of cases (Tables 2 and 3). We collected a total of 95 adverse effects (1.6 adverse drug reactions per report), of which 84.21% have already been associated with DMF (Figures 3 and 4 and Table 2) and 15.79% were unexpected (Figures 3 and 5 and Table 3).

Generally, a well-known manifestation during DMF treatment is flushing, which was also registered in our study in ~56.89% of reports (N=33), with a mild or moderate severity. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions also commonly occurred in 43.10% of cases and reported as diarrhea (N=6), abdominal pain and abdominal pain upper (N=12), nausea (N=2), gastrointestinal disorders (N=8), and gastroenteritis (N=1). Several cases of rash (N=4), pruritus (N=6), and lymphopenia (N=3) were recorded too. In addition, a few patients experienced hepatic disorders during DMF treatment, related to elevation of transaminases (N=2) and a severe drug-induced liver injury (N=1). The remaining expected effects reported were asthenia (N=1) and burning sensation on a patient trunk (N=1).

The number of unexpected adverse events was significant compared to those recorded for NAT and FTY720 (Figure 3).

The unexpected effects we noticed referred to thrombocytosis (N=1), lymphadenopathy (N=1), respiratory failure (N=1), rhinitis (N=1), dyspnea (N=1), headache (N=2), vertigo (N=2), insomnia (N=1), pain (N=1), vaginal discharge (N=1), weight decrease (N=1), and chest pain (N=1). In addition, we recorded omphalitis (N=1), an infection of the umbilical stump.

Finally, our analysis showed that DMF was permanently discontinued in 36.21% of reports due to the adverse reactions, whereas in 3.45%, it was decided to suspend the treatment only temporarily; 60.34% reported the continuation of DMF administration.

Comparison of adverse drug reactions occurred in DMTs with different routes of administration

DMTs may be administered through different routes. In particular, IFN β-1a-R, IFN β-1b, PEG IFN β-1a, and GA are injected subcutaneously; IFN β-1a-A is administered by intramuscular injection, while NAT is an intravenous infusion therapy. FTY720, teriflunomide, and DMF are oral agents.

We compared drugs administered through injection/infusion with those given orally.

For these two groups, we put together the collected data to perform a comparative analysis. Starting from 265 reports related to DMTs treated patients, we analyzed an amount of 411 adverse drug reactions, of which 224 adverse drug reactions were attributed to injectable/intravenous agents and 187 adverse drug reactions were recorded during oral drugs, corresponding to 54.5 and 45.5%, respectively. Specifically, we collected 195 expected (16 severe, 116 moderate, 62 mild, and one unavailable intensity) and 29 unexpected adverse reactions (three severe, 16 moderate, nine mild, and one unavailable intensity) related to injectable or infusion therapies. The percentages of expected and unexpected events were 87.05 and 12.95, respectively. In addition, 151 expected (15 severe, 82 moderate, and 54 mild) and 36 unexpected (10 severe, 23 moderate, and three mild) adverse effects were reported during oral therapies. A total of 80.75% of the reactions recorded in oral agents have already been associated with these drugs, whereas 19.25% were unexpected.

Discussion

MS is a chronic disease of the CNS primarily characterized by demyelination and axonal loss caused by autoreactive T cells. Although its etiology has not been completely understood yet, over the last 20 years, numerous therapies have been made available to patients in order to improve their quality of life. Just for this purpose, the expansion of treatment options for MS has led to the introduction of DMTs with the aim of improving the clinical course of this disease and reducing long-term disability.

The first consideration that we can deduce from this study is that only a small portion of RR-MS patients show the onset of adverse events during the therapeutic treatment. Indeed, only 265 patients on a total of 6,039 showed at least one adverse drug reaction.

We observed that in most cases, IFNs were administered as first therapy. Furthermore, in the majority of patients treated with previous treatments, the first drugs administered were IFNs. However, it was not possible to properly consider the importance of the sequence of the drugs used on the onset of adverse events, because of the wide variety of the different combinations of therapies used and the small cohort of this study that caused an excessive fragmentation in small groups of patients.

During our program, we monitored five different IFNs. The whole group has been involved in a high number of adverse drug reactions that were almost completely expected and of mild-to-moderate intensity. Very few events were unexpected, and among these, only one was of a severe grade. The latter referred to a case of erectile dysfunction in a 53-year-old male patient, who had undergone 308 IFN β-1a-A administrations before the adverse reaction onset.

These data led us to confirm the safety profile of these drugs, similar to what Zettl et al24 affirmed in their review, in which they have defined the IFNs related adverse reactions as mild, manageable, and reversible.

The highest amount of reported adverse effects was attributed to PEG IFN β-1a and IFN β-1a-R. On the contrary, IFN β-1b-E collected the lowest number of adverse events among those attributed to IFNs during our program. It is important to evaluate when the adverse reaction appeared during the course of therapy, given that adverse events appearing later could be due to accumulated toxicity. Interestingly, in most cases, all IFNs, except PEG IFN β-1a, caused adverse reactions after the administration of an elevated number of doses. On the contrary, PEG IFN β-1a-associated adverse events appeared earlier.

GA showed a comparable trend to PEG IFN β-1a: for both drugs, an analog number of reported adverse reactions and a similar severity in unexpected events were recorded; on the contrary, expected reaction intensity tended to be more moderate–severe in GA-treated patients.

For IFNs and GA, injection site reactions were the most common. In particular, we highlighted pain, redness, pruritus, mass, and skin manifestations for both of these drugs, while IFNs were also related to abscess, necrosis, and bruising. Furthermore, only IFNs have been strongly associated with flu-like symptoms. These data are in agreement with Moses and Brandes,25 who obtained similar information after performing a search on the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to analyze the studies published between 1985 and 2007.

NAT was one of the drugs with the lowest number of reported adverse reactions, despite being a strongly monitored agent due to the drug–PML risk correlation. PML is a demyelinating brain disease caused by John Cunningham virus (JCV) infection that occurs in immunocompromised patients but also associated with specific immunotherapies. As of December 7, 2017, there have been 756 confirmed cases of NAT-associated PML.26 In the STRATA MS study, 14 confirmed cases of PML were detected on a total of 1,094 patients. All these patients had detectable anti-JCV antibodies at least 6 months before diagnosis and after at least 2 years of NAT exposure.27 However, no report of such infection correlated with this drug was detected in our program, but it is important to notice that it may be due to the low number of reports received for NAT.

Among the recorded NAT-related adverse reactions, we observed more unexpected than expected events; however, almost all had a mild-to-moderate intensity and they did not result in NAT discontinuation. Our results are in line with another pharmacovigilance program on NAT conducted in Sicily region, which showed a similar severity grade in the reactions they analyzed.28

For years, only the DMTs requiring parenteral administration had been available. More recently, a great goal has been achieved in the MS therapeutic scenario thanks to the introduction of oral DMTs, which should ensure a higher adherence due to their easier route of administration. In this context, pharmacovigilance is essential for monitoring the safety profile of these agents and detecting any adverse reactions not shown in clinical trials.

Considering oral DMTs, DMF recorded the highest number of adverse events, both for expected and for unexpected effects. The expected reactions were mostly of mild–moderate intensity, while among the unexpected moderate severity prevailed. Teriflunomide was the second for the number of reported reactions, in which moderate expected events dominated. However, unexpected effects were the lowest compared to the other oral therapies, but none of them was mild.

Finally, FTY720 was the oral agent reporting the lowest number of adverse events, but it recorded the highest level of severe unexpected reactions in the entire sample of the examined drugs.

Both teriflunomide and DMF have been commonly associated with gastrointestinal disorders, described mainly as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and gastroenteritis. Together with these adverse effects, the most frequent event associated with DMF was flushing, while alopecia and hypertension have been reported by several teriflunomide-treated patients. All this information is in accordance with data from TEMSO and DEFINE studies, two Phase III clinical trials describing an increased incidence of the reactions mentioned earlier in patients receiving the active treatment compared to the placebo group.29,30

A common point highlighted during our analysis in all the oral DMTs was an increase in liver enzymes, an event already described in Phase III clinical trials. In particular, elevations in hepatic enzyme levels were common findings in TEMSO and FREEDOMS studies, with a percentage of 14.2 and 15.8, respectively.8,29 This adverse reaction was also associated with DMF in DEFINE trial, but with a lower percentage (6%).30 Also, in our study, among patients reporting oral DMTs related adverse reactions, a higher percentage was associated with FTY720 (21%) and teriflunomide (10.5%), while a lower number of cases was reported for DMF (3.4%).

In order to verify if the recorded unexpected reactions had already been highlighted, we evaluated them compared to what is reported in literature.

One FTY720-treated patient died because of an aortic dissection. The subject in question was a 65-year-old man treated with FTY720 for more than a year and without concomitant disease related to the cause of death. No other cases of aortic dissection during FTY720 therapy had previously been described in the literature. Anyhow, this agent has already been associated with cardiovascular events, such as hypertension, T-wave inversion, bradycardia, bradyarrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, and atrioventricular block.21,31

Another unexpected adverse event reported in our study was a bilateral ovarian carcinoma, occurred in a 50-year-old female patient treated with FTY720 for 5 years. From information available in the summary of product characteristics and literature, it is known that this drug has been involved in several cases of cancer, such as Merkel cell carcinoma, Kaposi sarcoma, melanoma, and basal cell carcinoma.3134 Even in our study, this last skin cancer has been reported in a 48-year-old female patient treated with FTY720 for 15 months.

At the same time, a potential anticancer role of FTY720 has already been shown, due to inhibition of the proto-oncogene sphingosine kinase 1 (SK1).35 In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate the ability of this agent to induce apoptosis and autophagy in ovarian cancer cells and decrease tumor weight, supporting its potential therapeutic role in this type of cancer.36,37 This evidence is in contrast with our case report of bilateral ovarian carcinoma, questioning the correlation between this drug and the adverse event occurred.

In our study, FTY720 has also been correlated to hypothyroidism. This unexpected event occurred in a 32-year-old woman treated with the drug in question for >2 months. Patients affected by MS show an important risk of autoimmune diseases, such as thyroid dysfunctions;38 FTY720 may increase this susceptibility due to its immunomodulatory MOA. Another similar case was previously described in the literature, strengthening this possible association and the need of additional researches.39

Strangely, a case involving a 36-year-old woman who contracted PML during teriflunomide treatment was reported.40 After a 10-year therapy with IFN β-1a, the patient has undergone NAT for ~3 years (33 infusions). This last agent was discontinued because of a JCV index of 3.6, although the last magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed after NAT suspension showed no signs of PML.40 Subsequently, the patient started teriflunomide treatment. After 8 months from NAT discontinuation, the teriflunomide-treated patient underwent a brain MRI, which detected a new lesion highly suggestive of PML. Actually, the occurrence of this infection after only 3 months of teriflunomide administration suggests a long incubation of JCV and the possible involvement of NAT.40

Previously, some PML cases associated with the oral DMF and FTY720 have been described.41 On the contrary, no certain teriflunomide-related PML has been reported yet, although some cases involving its precursor molecule leflunomide were observed.42,43 These results suggest the importance of a more prolonged PML monitoring and the need for increased data related to DMTs–PML correlation.

Considering NAT, an adverse drug reaction case report of bronchopneumonia in a 53-year-old female patient was received. This subject had undergone 34 NAT administrations before the adverse reaction onset. Although this event is unexpected according to the summary of product characteristics, different cases of pulmonary infection during NAT treatment have been described in the literature, such as pulmonary tuberculosis, Mycobacterium intracellulare pneumonia, and a case of Mycobacterium kansasii lung infection.4446 This evidence suggests a possible role of this agent in opportunistic pulmonary infections, probably due to its immunosuppressive action.

In our study, we analyzed a case of omphalitis in a 24-year-old male patient treated with DMF for 5 months.47 Omphalitis is an infection of the umbilical stump that mainly affects newborns and only rarely adults. No case of omphalitis during DMF treatment has been reported in the literature yet. However, the recovery of the infection after DMF discontinuation and the reappearance of the event following the restart of this agent suggest a connection between the treatment and the development of omphalitis.

Two cases of headache occurring during DMF therapy were also reported. The patients in question were a 37-year-old woman and a 27-year-old man treated with this drug for 3 months and 1 month, respectively. We considered these events as unexpected because headache is not mentioned in the summary of product characteristics.23 However, a multi-centric study in RR-MS patients has reported it as a common adverse reaction in their cohort during DMF treatment, with a dose-related pattern.48

Finally, we received a report involving a 54-year-old woman in therapy with DMF from 1 month who showed widespread pain and asthenia. The patient presented fibromyalgia as concomitant disease. Pain is not an expected effect of this agent; however, musculoskeletal pain and articular pain occurring during DMF therapy have recently been described.49 Despite this new evidence, we cannot exclude fibromyalgia among the causes of this adverse event.

By examining the route of administration of DMTs and comparing the data collected for injectable/intravenous drugs and oral agents, we observed that the trend in these two groups was rather similar, even if a higher percentage of unexpected events were detected during oral therapies, especially in reference to those of a severe intensity. These data reflect an important knowledge deficit in the long-term safety of oral DMTs, which have been approved in our country only a few years ago, starting in 2011 with FTY720.

Conclusion

In our study, we observed that these treatments seem safe, given that only a small portion of RR-MS patients developed adverse drug events. Furthermore, the most frequently reported adverse reactions occurred during DMTs were expected. However, the higher number of unexpected events and the magnitude of some serious effects reported for oral therapies reflect the lack of data for these treatments that were introduced later in the clinical practice and the importance of postmarketing safety studies to improve knowledge on the subject. Another additional explanation to justify the higher number of unexpected reactions for oral drugs could be the greater attention of health professionals toward these treatments that are still little known compared to the others. Both teriflunomide and FTY720 are in fact under additional monitoring, according to EMA directive.

The limitation of this study was the small number of centers participating, but it encourages and underlines the importance of pharmacovigilance studies, in order to protect the health of patients who already presented a disease of such importance and to better characterize the long-term safety profile of MS therapies.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by funds of multiregional pharmacovigilance project entitled “Valutazione e riconoscimento delle reazioni avverse in pazienti affetti da sclerosi multipla trattati farmacologicamente” of 2010/2011 of Italian Drug Agency (AIFA).

Footnotes

Author contributions

AG and FL performed the analysis and interpretation of data and wrote the manuscript. MGM, GLM, IG, MM, and PB provided adverse drug reaction reports and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. FLG performed data analysis and designed the figures. EM designed the study and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and critically revising the paper and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Browne P, Chandraratna D, Angood C, et al. Atlas of Multiple Sclerosis 2013: A growing global problem with widespread inequity. Neurology. 2014;83(11):1022–1024. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ransohoff RM, Hafler DA, Lucchinetti CF. Multiple sclerosis-a quiet revolution. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(3):134–142. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van den Broek HH, Damoiseaux JG, de Baets MH, Hupperts RM. The influence of sex hormones on cytokines in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a review. Mult Scler. 2005;11(3):349–359. doi: 10.1191/1352458505ms1174rr. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dhib-Jalbut S, Marks S. Interferon-beta mechanisms of action in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2010;74(Suppl 1):S17–S24. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c97d99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hutchinson M. Natalizumab: A new treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3(2):259–268. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.2.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ziemssen T, Schrempf W. Glatiramer acetate: mechanisms of action in multiple sclerosis. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2007;79:537–570. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(07)79024-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miller AE. Oral teriflunomide in the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis: clinical evidence and long-term experience. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2017;10(12):381–396. doi: 10.1177/1756285617722500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kappos L, Radue EW, O’Connor P, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(5):387–401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mills EA, Ogrodnik MA, Plave A, Mao-Draayer Y. Emerging Understanding of the Mechanism of Action for Dimethyl Fumarate in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2018;9:5. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Torkildsen Ø, Myhr KM, Bo L. Disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis – a review of approved medications. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(Suppl 1):18–27. doi: 10.1111/ene.12883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gajofatto A, Benedetti MD. Treatment strategies for multiple sclerosis: When to start, when to change, when to stop? World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(7):545–555. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i7.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Longbrake EE, Cross AH, Salter A. Efficacy and tolerability of oral versus injectable disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in clinical practice. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2016;2 doi: 10.1177/2055217316677868. 205521731667786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guarnera C, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. Comparison of efficacy and safety of oral agents for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:2193–2207. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S137572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.EMA European Medicines Agency Interferon β-1a (Avonex®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000102/WC500029425.pdf.
  • 15.EMA European Medicines Agency Interferon β-1a (Rebif®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000136/WC500048681.pdf.
  • 16.EMA European Medicines Agency Interferon β-1b (Betaferon®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000081/WC500053225.pdf.
  • 17.EMA European Medicines Agency Interferon β-1b (Extavia®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000933/WC500034701.pdf.
  • 18.EMA European Medicines Agency Peginterferon β-1a (Plegridy®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002827/WC500170302.pdf.
  • 19.AIFA Italian Drug Agency Glatiramer acetato (Copaxone®) Rias-sunto delle caratteristiche del prodotto [Glatiramer Acetate Summary of Product Characteristics] [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/aifa/servlet/PdfDownloadServlet?pdfFileName=footer_002351_035418_RCP.pdf&retry=0&sys=m0b1l3.
  • 20.EMA European Medicines Agency Natalizumab (Tysabris®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000603/WC500044686.pdf.
  • 21.EMA European Medicines Agency Fingolimod (Gilenya®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002202/WC500104528.pdf.
  • 22.EMA European Medicines Agency Teriflunomide (Aubagio®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002514/WC500148682.pdf.
  • 23.EMA European Medicines Agency Dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera®) Summary of Product Characteristics. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002601/WC500162069.pdf.
  • 24.Zettl UK, Hecker M, Aktas O, Wagner T, Rommer PS. Interferon β-1a and β-1b for patients with multiple sclerosis: updates to current knowledge. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14(2):137–153. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1426462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moses H, Brandes DW. Managing adverse effects of disease-modifying agents used for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(9):2679–2690. doi: 10.1185/03007990802329959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Biogen Medical Information [webpage on the Internet] PML Incidence in Patients Receiving Tysabri®. [Accessed September 5, 2018]. Available from: https://medinfo.biogen.com/
  • 27.O’Connor P, Goodman A, Kappos L, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of natalizumab redosing and treatment in the STRATA MS Study. Neurology. 2014;83(1):78–86. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Giacoppo S, Ruscica M, Grimaldi LM, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. The Italian Pharmacovigilance Program: An Observational Study of Adverse Effects of Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:4230–4240. doi: 10.12659/MSM.903301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.O’Connor P, Wolinsky JS, Confavreux C, et al. Randomized trial of oral teriflunomide for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(14):1293–1303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1098–1107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Calabresi PA, Radue EW, Goodin D, et al. Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(6):545–556. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mahajan KR, Ko JS, Tetzlaff MT, Hudgens CW, Billings SD, Cohen JA. Merkel cell carcinoma with fingolimod treatment for multiple sclerosis: A case report. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;17:12–14. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Walker S, Brew B. Kaposi sarcoma in a fingolimod-treated patient with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;31:217–218. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Conzett KB, Kolm I, Jelcic I, et al. Melanoma occurring during treatment with fingolimod for multiple sclerosis: a case report. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(8):991–992. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.White C, Alshaker H, Cooper C, Winkler M, Pchejetski D. The emerging role of FTY720 (Fingolimod) in cancer treatment. Oncotarget. 2016;7(17):23106–23127. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang N, Qi Y, Wadham C, et al. FTY720 induces necrotic cell death and autophagy in ovarian cancer cells: a protective role of autophagy. Autophagy. 2010;6(8):1157–1167. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.8.13614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee JW, Ryu JY, Yoon G, et al. Sphingosine kinase 1 as a potential therapeutic target in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(1):221–229. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Marrie RA, Horwitz RI. Emerging effects of comorbidities on multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(8):820–828. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Flores J, Rito Y, Torres G, Jung H, Treviño-Frenk I, Corona T. Hypothyroidism in multiple sclerosis patient during fingolimod treatment. J Neurol Sci. 2015;348(1–2):272–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lorefice L, Fenu G, Gerevini S, et al. PML in a person with multiple sclerosis: Is teriflunomide the felon? Neurology. 2018;90(2):83–85. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Berger JR. Classifying PML risk with disease modifying therapies. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;12:59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rahmlow M, Shuster EA, Dominik J, et al. Leflunomide-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(11):1538–1539. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.11.1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Warnatz K, Peter HH, Schumacher M, et al. Infectious CNS disease as a differential diagnosis in systemic rheumatic diseases: three case reports and a review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(1):50–57. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dahdaleh D, Altmann DM, Malik O, Nicholas RS, Breathlessness NRS. Breathlessness, night sweats, and weight loss on natalizumab. Lancet. 2012;380(9843):726–727. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61401-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.de Masson A, Maillart E, Veziris N, Meyssonnier V, Papeix C, Caumes E. Cavitary pulmonary disease in a patient treated with natalizumab. Presse Med. 2014;43(9):1009–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2013.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hradilek P, Zeman D, Tudik I, Zapletalova O, Ulmann V. Asymptomatic lung disease caused by Mycobacterium kansasii as an opportunistic infection in a patient treated with natalizumab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014;20(5):639–640. doi: 10.1177/1352458513501572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lorefice L, Fenu G, Cabras F, et al. An unusual infection in MS patient treated with dimethyl fumarate: A case report of omphalitis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016;7:65–67. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kappos L, Gold R, Miller DH, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1463–1472. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61619-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bernardini LR, Zecca C, Clerici VT, Gobbi C, Mantegazza R, Rossi S. Severe articular and musculoskeletal pain: An unexpected side effect of dimethyl-fumarate therapy for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2016;369:139–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES