Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Feb 7;40(10):1206–1213. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1283712

Table 6.

Patient reported outcome scores by level of impairment as defined by the AMAT cut-scores (low: 0–24, moderate: 25–34, high: 35–45).

Variables AMAT
Low (n=15) Moderate (n=9) High (n=11)
ABC 36.9 (15.7) 39.8 (20.1)c 75.3 (25.1)d**
IBMFRS 25.1 (8.7)b# 29.9 (5.3) 35.8 (4.6)e
HAP maximum activity scorea 11.73# 11.69 24.33
HAP adjusted activity score 38.3 (17.6) 45.2 (19.1) 74.3 (12.3)**
a

Kruskal-Wallis performed and mean rank presented. Chi-square = 13.11

b

n=16

c

n=8

d

n=9

e

n=10

with missing/incomplete scores excluded.

**

p<0.001 compared to low and moderate functioning AMAT groups

#

p<0.001 compared to high AMAT group