Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 1;46(10):4082–4091. doi: 10.1177/0300060518785827

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival in patients with and without solitary lymph node metastasis (SLNM).

Parameter β SE Wald Statistical significance Risk ratio 95% CI
FIGO stage 0.416 NS
 IB versus IA2 –0.022 0.832 0.001 NS 0.978 0.191, 5.002
 IIA versus IA2 –0.215 0.347 0.385 NS 0.807 0.409, 1.591
Tumour size –0.360 0.337 1.135 NS 0.698 0.360, 1.352
Tumour grade 0.746 0.252 8.720 P = 0.003 2.108 1.285, 3.457
Depth of tumour invasion 6.719 P = 0.035
 T2 versus T1 –1.272 0.537 5.604 P = 0.018 0.280 0.098, 0.803
 T3 versus T1 –1.025 0.421 5.914 P = 0.015 0.359 0.157, 0.820
Uterine body metastasis 0.555 0.515 1.157 NS 1.741 0.634, 4.782
Lymphovascular invasion –0.725 0.390 3.463 NS 0.484 0.226, 1.039
Parametrial involvement –0.725 0.437 17.310 P < 0.001 0.162 0.069, 0.382
Postoperative treatment 0.703 0.564 1.665 NS 1.734 0.769, 5.463
SLNM 0.955 0.302 9.973 P = 0.002 2.598 1.437, 4.700
Ovarian shift 0.514 0.474 1.177 NS 1.672 0.661, 4.229

CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; T1, invasive <1/2 muscle layer; T2, invasive ≥ 1/2 muscle layer; T3, invasive cervical internal surface; NS, no significant association (P ≥ 0.05).