Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 17;2018:9819402. doi: 10.1155/2018/9819402

Table 2.

Comparison of ultrasonographic measurements among groups.

Group 1, control n=50 Group 2, mild pain n=50 Group 3, moderate pain n=50 Group 4, severe pain n=50 P value
Uterine corpus longitudinal axis (mm) 45.60 ± 4.78a 44.76 ± 2.75a 46.08 ± 4.77a 45.94 ± 3.41a 0.359
Uterine corpus transverse axis (mm) 33.02 ± 2.41a 33.32 ± 2.18a 32.46 ± 2.13a 32.82 ± 2.25a 0.279
Uterine cervix longitudinal axis (mm) 31.94 ± 2.04a 32.10 ± 1.60a 31.66 ± 1.90a 32.46 ± 1.34a 0.369
Anterior uterocervical angle 146.8 ± 6.0a 143.3 ± 7.3a 121.2 ± 7.3b 101.9 ± 9.2c 0 < 001

Note. BMI, body mass index; PD, primary dysmenorrhea. Superscript numbers indicate the absence (a) or presence (b,c) of statistically significant differences. The Minitab®16 statistical program (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality assumption of the data and Levene's test was used to assess the variance homogeneity assumption. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Parametric comparisons were made via t-test or z-test, and nonparametric comparisons were made via Mann–Whitney U test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.