Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 25;75(10):752–758. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105151

Table 3.

The effect on musculoskeletal pain at follow-up from working conditions in participants with no pain at baseline

Individual-level measurement Job exposure matrix (JEM)
Difference in mean number of painful body regions* P values Difference in mean number of painful body regions* P values
Continuous exposures
 Physical work demands, per one point increase of score (8–48)
   Men 0.02 <0.001 0.02 0.0111
   Women 0.03 <0.001 0.02 0.0010
 Quantitative demands, per one point increase score (1–5)
   Men 0.01 0.7141 −0.23 0.1319
   Women 0.04 0.3241 −0.18 0.2400
 Emotional demands, per one point increase of score (1–5)
   Men 0.00 0.9030 −0.03 0.6799
   Women 0.06 0.0494 0.05 0.3914
 Decision authority, per one point increase of score (1–5)
   Men −0.12 0.0008 −0.27 0.0780
   Women −0.01 0.8668 −0.00 0.9881
Dichotomous expsoures†
 Job strain
   Men 0.03 0.5588 −0.07 0.8017
   Women 0.02 0.8386 0.03 0.9402
 High job insecurity
   Men 0.13 0.1729 0.19 0.5957
   Women 0.11 0.2685 0.21 0.6230
 Violence
   Men 0.09 0.5899 0.66 0.0598
   Women 0.16 0.0419 0.43 0.1060

*Adjusted for baseline age and education. The number of painful body regions ranges from 0 to 5.

†Association estimates for dichotomous exposures compare high versus low (violence and job strain: yes/no) in individual-level analyses and the risk associated with a 1% increased risk of exposure in JEM-level analyses.