Table 1.

Farm-specific baseline (business as usual), APs, and GHG emissions

Farm/year and treatment	Inorganic nitrogen,* kg⋅ha−1	Carbon input,† t⋅ha−1	Water index,‡ cm	Flood events§	Intermittent flooding regime¶	N2O, kg⋅ha−1	CH4, kg⋅ha−1	Yield, t⋅ha−1
Agroecological region# 3.0 (seed variety BPT 5204)
Farm 1 2012
Baseline	91	3.9–4.5	−555 (85)	1	Medium	13.1 (6.03)	66.5 (38.4)	4.8
Alternate	0	4.1–4.8	−580 (144)	1	Medium	4.7 (1.53)	81.1 (69.7)	4.6
Farm 2 2013
Baseline	243	5.6–6.8	−0.7 (33)	3	Mild	0.62 (0.47)	105 (7.23)	4.8
Alternate	0	8.4–10.0	−152 (16)	3	Mild	0.10 (0.20)	98.3 (74.5)	2.7
Agroecological Region# 8.3 (seed variety ADT 39)
Farm 3 2012‖
Baseline	219	0.0–0.0	−486 (10)	0	Medium	22.7 (7.47)	3.98 (4.89)	4.2
Alternate	61	2.7–3.7	−416 (81)	0	Medium	2.51 (0.69)	4.6 (0.39)	2.7
Farm 3 2013
Baseline	202	0.6–0.8	−1,036 (16)	3	Intense	17.4 (15.4)	108 (11.2)	5.6
Alternate	20	2.5–3.0	−858 (52)	3	Intense	11.5 (9.55)	112 (33.9)	4.0
Farm 4 2014
Baseline	174	1.0–1.2	−212 (63)	3	Mild/medium	0.88 (0.83)	141 (19.3)	3.5
Alternate	91	1.1–1.4	−316 (147)	5	Mild/medium	0.02 (0.2)	154 (54.3)	3.2
Agroecological Region# 8.1 (seed variety ASD 16)
Farm 5 2013
Baseline	121	0.0–0.0	15 (65)	3	Mild	1.39 (1.66)	286 (49.1)	6.5
Alternate	99	0.01–0.02	−155 (91)	4	Mild	2.47 (1.16)	216 (88.1)	6.5

All errors in parentheses represent the ±95% confidence intervals (n = 3).

^*The ranges for mineralized organic nitrogen and emission factors for each replicate are presented in Dataset S1, Table 30.

^†Organic C content range as estimated via literature review (Dataset S1, Table 4–9).

^‡Cumulative extent of flooding as determined by FWTs (SI Appendix, SI Text, section 3).

^§Number of times a replicate had flooding for >3 d.

^¶SI Appendix, Fig. S1 presents our definitions of flooding regimes.

^#See SI Appendix, Fig. S2, for a regional map.

^‖The methane flame ionization detector behaved anomalously in this cropping season, likely causing unusually low methane emissions.