Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;115(39):E9220–E9229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805517115

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Distinct modulation of calcium activity during slow oscillation and spindle. (A, Left) Grand average (across all events from all animals) of the EEG signal (filtered between 0.1 and 4 Hz) during slow oscillation(s) (SO) time-locked to the negative SO half-wave peak (0 s). (A, Right) Grand average of the rms of EEG spindle (Spi) signal (7–15 Hz) time-locked to Spi onset (0 s). (B) Mean ΔF/F signals for putative Pyr cells (green), PV-Ins (blue), and SOM-Ins (red) during solitary SO (Top Left) and solitary Spi (Top Right) and during SO co-occurring with Spi (SO + Spi), time-locked to a negative SO half-wave peak (Bottom Left) and to Spi onset (Bottom Right). Bars on top indicate significance (P < 0.05) with reference to a baseline (−3 to −2 s) set to zero. Average traces across all events from all animals are indicated. (C, Left) Comparison of mean (±SEM) ΔF/F signals between solitary SO and SO + Spi events for the positive-to-negative transition phase (Trans; −0.32 to −0.00 s, with reference to the SO negative half-wave peak = 0 s), the down phase (−0.00 to 0.16 s), the up phase (0.32–0.48 s), and the following after phase (0.54–3 s). (C, Right) Comparisons between mean (±SEM) ΔF/F signals between solitary Spi and SO + Spi events for the phase during the acute Spi (0–1 s with reference to Spi onset set to 0 s) and the after phase (1–3 s). **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, and tP < 0.1 for pairwise comparisons between solitary events and SO + Spi events respectively. ##P < 0.01, #P < 0.05, and tP < 0.1 for difference from baseline activity (−3 to −2 s).