Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 1;13(10):e0202553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202553

Table 6. Model fit indices for the multigroup measurement invariance models of the Faux Pas Recognition Test.

Model χ2 (df) p RMSEA Δ χ2 (df) p RMSEA 90% CI CFI TLI
Subscale 1 –stories with faux pas
Configurala 23.516(15) 0.073 0.047 - - 0.000–0.082 0.988 0.975
Scalarb 28.633(21) 0.123 0.038 6.177(6) 0.403 0.000–0.070 0.989 0.984
Strictd 46.41(31) 0.037 0.044 17.896(10) 0.056 0.011–0.069 0.978 0.978
Subscale 2 –stories without faux pas
Configurala 17.272(15) 0.303 0.024 - - 0.000–0.067 0.994 0.988
Scalarb 32.784(21) 0.048 0.047 14.284(6) 0.026 0.004–0.077 0.968 0.954
Scalarc 20.310(19) 0.376 0.016 3.393(4) 0.494 0.000–0.058 0.996 0.994
Strictd 36.522(27) 0.104 0.037 4.952(6) 0.550 0.000–0.066 0.974 0.971

Note. χ2 = chi-square goodness-of-fit statistic; df = degrees of freedom; TLI = Tucker–Lewis Index; CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval

a Factor loadings and thresholds freely estimated

b Factor loadings and thresholds constrained (without modifications).

c Factor loadings and thresholds constrained (after modification)

d Factor loadings, thresholds and residual variances constrained.