Table 2.
Strain/line | Time (n) | DOPAC (pg/eye) | Dopamine (pg/eye) | DOPAC/DA ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
B6 | CT06 (4) | 243.5 ± 44.7 | 2,041.0 ± 66.4 | 0.122 ± 0.0253 |
CT18-20 (4) | 282.7 ± 43.7 | 1,719.4 ± 80.1 (*) | 0.165 ± 0.0256 | |
CBA | CT06 (5) | 790.5 ± 20.2 (†††) |
2,091.6 ± 40.1 | 0.379 ± 0.0121 (†††) |
CT18-20 (5) | 484.1 ± 18.7 (***, †††) |
1,855.1 ± 32.1 (**) |
0.261 ± 0.00996 (***, †††) |
|
B6 congenic | CT06 (6) | 352.6 ± 8.55 (†, ###) |
1,236.6 ± 32.6 (†††, ###) |
0.286 ± 0.00883 (†††, ##) |
CT18-20 (6) | 311.8 ± 3.92 (***, ###) |
1,200.9 ± 17.4 (*, †††, ###) |
0.269 ± 0.00259 (*, †††) |
|
ANOVA | CT06 |
F(2,12)=140.2 (P=4.8e-9) |
F(2,12)=128.4 (P=7.9e-9) | F(2,12)=68.5 (P=2.7e-7) |
CT18-20 |
F(2,12)=22.7 (P=8.4e-5) |
F(2,12)=73.7 (P=1.8e-7) |
F(2,12)=16.1 (P=4.0e-4) |
Data are mean ± SEM from n animals. Subjective day/subjective night difference was tested within each genotype using 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test:
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001.
Differences between daytime values or between nighttime values were tested between genotypes using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc analysis.
P<0.05,
P<0.001 (compared to B6),
P<0.01,
P<0.001 (compared to CBA).