Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pineal Res. 2018 Jun 6;65(3):e12509. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12509

Table 2.

DOPAC, DA and DOPAC/DA ratio in B6, CBA and congenic mice

Strain/line Time (n) DOPAC (pg/eye) Dopamine (pg/eye) DOPAC/DA ratio
B6 CT06 (4) 243.5 ± 44.7 2,041.0 ± 66.4 0.122 ± 0.0253
CT18-20 (4) 282.7 ± 43.7 1,719.4 ± 80.1 (*) 0.165 ± 0.0256
CBA CT06 (5) 790.5 ± 20.2
(†††)
2,091.6 ± 40.1 0.379 ± 0.0121
(†††)
CT18-20 (5) 484.1 ± 18.7
(***, †††)
1,855.1 ± 32.1
(**)
0.261 ± 0.00996
(***, †††)
B6 congenic CT06 (6) 352.6 ± 8.55
(, ###)
1,236.6 ± 32.6
(†††, ###)
0.286 ± 0.00883
(†††, ##)
CT18-20 (6) 311.8 ± 3.92
(***, ###)
1,200.9 ± 17.4
(*, †††, ###)
0.269 ± 0.00259
(*, †††)
ANOVA CT06 F(2,12)=140.2
(P=4.8e-9)
F(2,12)=128.4 (P=7.9e-9) F(2,12)=68.5 (P=2.7e-7)
CT18-20 F(2,12)=22.7
(P=8.4e-5)
F(2,12)=73.7
(P=1.8e-7)
F(2,12)=16.1
(P=4.0e-4)

Data are mean ± SEM from n animals. Subjective day/subjective night difference was tested within each genotype using 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test:

*

P<0.05,

**

P<0.01,

***

P<0.001.

Differences between daytime values or between nighttime values were tested between genotypes using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc analysis.

P<0.05,

†††

P<0.001 (compared to B6),

##

P<0.01,

###

P<0.001 (compared to CBA).