Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Mar 31;48(5):1326–1335. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26025

Table 4.

Concordance of lesion categorization by PI-RADSv2 and in-house systems. Parentheses indicate (% true positive for all cancer | % true positive for clinically significant cancer).

In-house system
categorization
PI-RADSv2 Lesion Categorization
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 (0% | 0%) 56 (16.1% | 7.1%) 39 (15.4% | 5.1%) 3 (33.3% | 0%) 0
2 2 (50% | 0%) 29 (24.1% | 13.8%) 53 (30.2% | 18.9%) 33 (18.2% | 6.1%) 0
3 0 8 (37.5% | 12.5%) 37 (24.3% | 8.1%) 259 (41.3% | 24.0%) 20 (55% | 35%)
4 0 0 2 (50% | 50%) 6 (83.3% | 50%) 52 (78.8% | 67.3%)
5 0 1 (0% | 0%) 2 (50% | 0%) 2 (50% | 0%) 127 (95.3% | 80.3%)