Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;9(5):1831–1851. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0496-z

Table 3.

Summary of the main findings of trials investigating the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues in type 1 diabetes

Sarkar et al. [47] Traina et al. [48] Frandsen et al. [46] Dejgaard et al. [44] Methieu et al. (ADJUNCT ONE) [50] Ahrén et al. (ADJUNCT TWO) [51] Dubé et al. [45] Weihao et al. [49]
Year 2014 2014 2015 2016 2016 2016 2018 2017
Study design Crossover RCT Retrospective analysis Placebo-controlled RCT Placebo-controlled RCT Placebo-controlled RCT Placebo-controlled RCT Crossover, placebo-controlled RCT Systematic review and meta-analysis
Agent investigated Exenatide Exenatide Liraglutide Liraglutide Liraglutide Liraglutide Liraglutide Liraglutide and exenatide
No. of participants 13 11, all of whom were treated with CSII 40 100 1398 835 15 206
Duration of study 12 months (6 months on exenatide, 6 months off) 3 months 12 weeks 24 weeks 52 weeks 26 weeks 24 weeks for each arm of crossover NA
Change in HbA1c − 0.1% (p = 0.39) − 0.6% (p = 0.013) No difference [− 0.2% (− 0.5, 0.1%), p > 0.1]

Estimated treatment difference vs placebo

1.8 mg liraglutide − 0.20% [95% CI − 0.32; − 0.07]

1.2 mg liraglutide − 0.15% [95% CI − 0.27; − 0.03]

0.6 mg liraglutide − 0.09% [95% CI − 0.21; 0.03]

Estimated treatment difference vs placebo

1.8 mg liraglutide –0.35% [95% CI –0.50; –0.20], p ≤ 0.0001

1.2 mg liraglutide

–0.23% [95% CI –0.38; –0.08], p = 0.0021

0.6 mg liraglutide

–0.24% [95% CI –0.39; –0.10], p = 0.0011

− 0.09% (p > 0.1) −0.21 (−0.40, 0.02), p = 0.03
Change in total daily insulin dose (units) Average of 0.54 units/kg/day ± 0.13 whilst in control 6 months (off exenatide). Average of 0.47 units/kg/day whilst on exenatide. Statistical difference between groups of p = 0.007 − 13% (p = 0.011) Not reported −5·8 (−10·7, −0·8), p = 0·0227

Expressed as estimated treatment ratios

1.8 mg liraglutide 0.92 [95% CI 0.88; 0.96]

1.2 mg liraglutide 0.95 [95% CI 0.91; 0.99]

0.6 mg liraglutide 1.00 [95% CI 0.96; 1.04]

Expressed as estimated treatment ratio

1.8 mg liraglutide 0.90 [95% CI 0.86; 0.93], p ≤ 0.0001 1.2 mg liraglutide 0.93 [95% CI 0.90; 0.96], p ≤ 0.0001 0.6 mg liraglutide 0.95 [95% CI 0.92; 0.99], p = 0.0075

− 6.72 (p > 0.1) Reduction in weight-adjusted insulin dose −0.11 (−0.23, 0.00), p = 0.05
Change in weight (kg unless stated otherwise) − 4.2 kg (p = 0.0003) − 3.7% (p = 0.008) − 4.3 (−5.7, −2.8), p < 0.001) −6·8 (−12·2, −1·4), p = 0·0145

1.8 mg liraglutide − 4.9 kg [95% CI − 5.7; − 4.2]

1.2 mg liraglutide − 3.6 kg [95% CI − 4.3; − 2.8]

0.6 mg liraglutide − 2.2 kg [95% CI − 2.9; − 1.5]

1.8 mg liraglutide

–5.1 kg

1.2 mg liraglutide

–4.0 kg

0.6 mg liraglutide

–2.5 kg;

All p ≤ 0.0.0001 vs placebo.

− 4.83 (p = 0.0001) −3.53 (−4.86, 2.19), p < 0.05
Adverse events reported None reported

Nonsignificant increase in rate of hypoglycaemia.

No significant adverse events reported

Gastrointestinal side effects in both groups (statistical difference between groups not reported)

Five participants required a temporary dose reduction in liraglutide group, and one participant had a maximum tolerated dose of 0.9 mg/day

Increase in heart rate found in the liraglutide group (7.5 BPM, 95% CI 2.8–12.2, p = 0.0019)

Increased number of gastrointestinal upsets in liraglutide group, but significance not reported

Rates of symptomatic hypoglycaemia increased across all groups

Significant increase in rate of hyperglycaemia with ketosis in the 1.8 mg liraglutide group (event rate ratio 2.22 [95% CI 1.13; 4.34])

Significantly higher rate of symptomatic hypoglycaemia in the 1.2 mg liraglutide group vs placebo (estimated rate ratio 1.31 [95% CI 1.03; 1.68], p = 0.0289)

Increased rate of hyperglycaemia with ketosis (> 1.5 mmol/L) in the 1.8 mg liraglutide group vs placebo (estimated rate ratio 3.96 [95% CI 1.49; 10.55], p = 0.0059)

93% of participants experienced nausea at some point in the study. None had to discontinue participation, and one participant had a maximum tolerated dose of liraglutide of 1.2 mg daily

Concluded that combination therapy with GLP-1 RA and insulin did not cause increased rate of hypoglycaemic events

Commented that gastrointestinal upset was common, but most participants could tolerate these effects