Table 3.
Dispersal events | AAR of parent node |
AAR of daughter node |
Age of parent node (Ma) |
Age of daughter node (Ma) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MP | 2 | MP | 1 | MP | 2 | MP | Mean | 95% HPD | Mean | 95% HPD | |
a | A | (58.7) | B | (27.1) | B | (65.3) | A | (16.9) | 22.9 | (17.1–28.4) | 18.9 | (13.7–24.5) |
b | B | (65.3) | A | (16.9) | C | (53.0) | A | (20.8) | 18.9 | (13.7–24.5) | 6.6 | (2.3–11.9) |
c | A | (78.5) | AB | (7.6) | B | (41.7) | C | (30.3) | 11.6 | (6.1–17.7) | 2.9 | (0.8–5.7) |
d | B | (58.3) | E | (25.6) | E | (84.5) | BE | (11.2) | 10.2 | (8.0–12.6) | 1.1 | (0.1–2.7) |
D | (61.1) | < 5% | – | 7.9 | (7.2–8.9) | |||||||
e | D | (61.1) | < 5% | – | I | (45.5) | G | (36.2) | 7.9 | (7.2–8.9) | 5.3 | (3.1–7.6) |
f | I | (45.5) | G | (36.2) | G | (96.7) | <5% | – | 5.3 | (3.1–7.6) | 2.2 | (0.5–4.0) |
g | C | (53.0) | A | (20.8) | A | (49.2) | D | (33.0) | 6.6 | (2.3–11.9) | 3.6 | (0.9–7.4) |
h | G | (90.2) | GH | (5.9) | H | (94.7) | <5% | – | 1.5 | (0.3–3.1) | 0.9 | (0.04–2.1) |
i | D | (95.4) | <5% | – | F | (93.5) | DF | (5.5) | 1.3 | (0.2–2.7) | 0.4 | (0.01–1.1) |
j | A | (49.2) | D | (33.0) | D | – | – | – | 3.6 | (0.9–7.4) | 0 | 0 |
k | E | (71.7) | BE | (17.8) | B | – | – | – | 0.3 | (0–0.8) | 0 | 0 |
l | B | (38.6) | C | (36.0) | C | (96.2) | <5% | – | 1.8 | (0.4–3.7) | 0.4 | (0–1.2) |
m | B | (45.4) | BC | (30.3) | C | – | – | – | 1.3 | (0.1–2.8) | 0 | 0 |
n | A | (81.6) | AD | (9.1) | D | (96.9) | <5% | – | 2.3 | (0.2–5.5) | 0.4 | (0–1.4) |
Dispersal numbers and area codes refer to Figure 5. For ancestral area reconstructions (AAR), the first two areas with the highest marginal probability (MP; in percent) are reported for both the parent and daughter nodes of each dispersal event. Age estimates are derived from Bayesian relaxed clock analysis treating priors on fossils as being drawn from a lognormal distribution. The mean date in million years ago and the 95% highest posterior density intervals are given for each parent and daughter node.