Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 16;2018:5437135. doi: 10.1155/2018/5437135

Table 2.

Summary of findings: mesalazine versus control interventions by subtype of diverticular disease.

Outcome Subtype of diverticular disease No. of participants (no. of studies) Absolute effect (per 100 patients treated) Relative effect (95% CI) Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) Conclusion
Achievement of disease remission Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease 123 (1) 3 more per 100
(95% CI: 14 fewer to 19 more)
1.04 (0.81 to 1.34) Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in the achievement of disease remission.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis 81 (1) 20 more per 100
(95% CI: 3 fewer to 38 more)
2.67 (1.05 to 6.79) Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to the achievement of disease remission.
Disease recurrence Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease 216 (2) 13 fewer per 100
(95% CI: 23 to 2 fewer)
0.52 (0.28 to 0.97) Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may decrease disease recurrence.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis 2196 (7) 3 fewer per 100
(95% CI: 12 fewer to 6 more)
0.90 (0.61 to 1.33) Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may lead to no difference in disease recurrence.
Acute diverticulitis onset in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease 484 (3) 3 fewer per 100
(95% CI: 7 fewer to 0)
0.26 (0.06 to 1.20) Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may lead to no difference in the development of acute diverticulitis in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease.
Need for surgery Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease 424 (2) No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
0.68 (0.03 to 16.39) Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in the need for surgery.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis 1263 (3) 1 more per 100
(95% CI: 0 to 2 more)
1.41 (0.51 to 3.90) Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may lead to no difference in the need for surgery.
Any adverse events Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease 391 (2) 1 fewer per 100
(95% CI: 5 fewer to 3 more)
1.04 (0.55 to 1.98) Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may lead to no difference in any adverse events.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis 2196 (7) 3 more per 100
(95% CI: 2 fewer to 7 more)
1.03 (0.96 to 1.11) Moderate
●●●○
Mesalazine probably results in no difference in any adverse events.
All-cause mortality Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease 607 (4) No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
No event in included studies Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in all-cause mortality.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis 1512 (5) No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
0.52 (0.05 to 5.68) Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in all-cause mortality.
Diverticular disease related mortality Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease 607 (4) No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
No event in included studies Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in diverticular disease related mortality.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis 1512 (5) No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
No event in included studies Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in diverticular disease related mortality.
Global symptoms scorea Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease 326 (2) Standardized mean difference: 1.01 lower
(95% CI: 1.51 to 0.52 lower)
- Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may improve the global symptoms score.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis 153 (2) Standardized mean difference: 0.56 lower
(95% CI: 0.88 to 0.24 lower)
- Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may slightly improve the global symptoms score.
Time to recurrence (days) Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease - (-) No studies - Absent No studies were found that evaluated the impact of mesalazine on time to disease recurrence of disease.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis 91 (3) Average difference in days: 30 lower (95% CI: 55 to 5 lower) - Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to a decrease in time to disease recurrence.

aThe standardized mean difference was used because global symptoms were assessed using different scales across included studies: 0 to 33 [24], 0 to 36 [25], 0 to 60 [29], and 4 to 40 [28].