Table 2.
Pairwise comparisons among subgroups endorsing restrictive eating and NSSI.
| F(df) | No behaviors (n = 43) M (SE) | One behavior only (n = 34) M (SE) | Both behaviors (n = 22) M (SE) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DERS total | 8.65(2)*** | 61.56a (2.46) | 74.16b (2.78) | 76.77b (3.49) |
| DERS clarity | 7.61(2)** | 8.27a (0.43) | 10.80b (0.49) | 9.74a,b (0.61) |
| DERS impulsivity | 8.39(2)*** | 7.50a (0.40) | 8.78a,b (0.45) | 10.30b (0.56) |
| DERS strategy | 7.03(2)** | 11.68a (0.85) | 15.75b (0.96) | 16.21b (1.20) |
| IIP-PD-25 total | 4.77(2)* | 0.83a (0.08) | 1.15b (0.09) | 1.20b (0.11) |
| IIP-PD-25 lack of sociability | 4.91(2)** | 0.73a (0.13) | 1.19b (0.13) | 1.29b (0.15) |
Note.
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001.
DERS = Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (Gratz & Roemer, 2006); IIP-PD-25 = Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Personality Disorders25 (Kim & Pilkonis, 1999). Estimated marginal means in each row with differing subscripts indicate significant pairwise differences. Analyses controlled for age, gender, and BMI.