Table 2.
Cartographic role | TARGET | TT | OT | METAB | TOXPROT | OTP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kinless hub | 3.4 (1.2e–14) | 4.2 (8.7e–15) | 1.7 (0.09) | 0.66 (1.0) | 2.6 (1.1e–11) | 1.3 (1.1e–01) |
Connector hub | 1.4 (2.2e–01) | 2.2 (1.9e–02) | 0.46 (1.0) | 0.32 (1.0) | 1.4 (1.0e–01) | 1 (7.8e–01) |
Provincial hub | 3.5 (2.0e–01) | 1.6 (7.9e–01) | 5.1 (0.19) | 0 (1.0) | 1.4 (7.8e–01) | 1.2 (8.5e–01) |
Kinless | 1.7 (1.5e–13) | 1.9 (1.7e–12) | 1.3 (0.02) | 1 (0.78) | 2 (3.5e–40) | 1.8 (3.8e–23) |
Connector | 1.1 (1.0e–01) | 1.1 (1.1e–01) | 1.1 (0.54) | 0.86 (1.0) | 1.2 (1.7e–03) | 1.1 (1.6e–02) |
Peripheral | 0.85 (1.0) | 0.74 (1.0) | 1 (0.6736) | 0.93 (1.0) | 0.8 (1.0) | 0.86 (1.0) |
Ultra-peripheral | 0.55 (1.0) | 0.49 (1.0) | 0.69 (1.0) | 1.3 (0.06) | 0.55 (1.0) | 0.62 (1.0) |
The fold enrichment of the Fisher’s exact test is shown with the corresponding p-value corrected by the Benjamini and Hochberg method between parentheses. The cartographic partition of the different gene sets in the INBIOMAP and HIPPIE interactomes is provided in Supplementary Table S3.