Abstract
Direct trifluoromethylation of unactivated aromatic rings at metabolically susceptible positions is highly desirable in pharmaceutical applications. By incorporating thiophenes into the backbone of triphenylamine to enlarge its π-system, a new approach for constructing coordination polymers is reported for direct trifluoromethylation without prefunctionalization of the aryl precursors. The improved light-harvesting ability and well-modulated excited state redox potential of the designed polymers endow the generated CF3 radicals with suitable reactivity and enhance radical adduct oxidation in pores. The well-configurated interactions between the organic ligands distort the coordination geometry to create active interaction sites within the coordination polymer; thus, the substrates could be docked near the photoredox-active centres. The synergistic electronic and spatial effects in the confined pores balance the contradictory demands of electronic effects and reaction dynamics, achieving regio- and diastereoselective discrimination among reaction sites with unremarkable electronic/steric differences.
Direct trifluoromethylation of unactivated aromatic rings at metabolically susceptible positions is highly desirable in pharmaceutical fields. Here, the authors report a new approach for direct trifluoromethylation of unactivated aromatics by incorporating thiophenes into the backbone of triphenylamine-based ligand.
Introduction
The installation of a trifluoromethyl group onto metabolically susceptible positions on aromatic rings increases the robustness of the corresponding drug candidates towards oxidative metabolism in vivo1, making the trifluoromethylation of aromatics a highly desirable chemical reaction2,3. In light of the photoinduced generation of highly reactive CF3 radicals, polypyridyl noble metal complexes enable direct C–H trifluoromethylation of unactivated aromatics under visible-light irradiation4. This approach bypasses tedious prefunctionalization of aryl precursors that is needed for transition metal-catalysed cross-couplings using a nucleophilic or electrophilic source of CF35,6. However, the discrimination of various aromatic positions without distinct electronic contributions is thermodynamically difficult due to the high electrophilicity of CF3 radicals. Trifluoromethylation of drugs with aromatic cores can protect them from aryl oxidative metabolism by enzymes in living cells (i.e., cytochrome P450). Thus, appending trifluoromethyl groups to the metabolically susceptible positions of aromatics without prefunctionalization of precursors7 is highly desirable, and it is promising to achieve this goal by merging all the catalytic requirements to controllably generate CF3 radicals under visible light and trigger the metabolically susceptible positions of aromatic drug candidates.
Porous coordination polymers exhibit confined pores similar to those in molecular sieves8,9, and the tenability and flexibility of the material allow for uniform heterogenization of photoactive organic dyes at high densities around the pores10–14. As the integration of near-ultraviolet (UV) responsive triphenylamine (TPA) and covalently binding group l-proline derivative into a single coordination polymer has been proven to be an effective approach to the photocatalytic α-15 or β-functionalization16 of saturated carbonyl compounds, we believe that merging the TPA-based chromophore with modulated photoelectronic property and the noncovalently binding site together within one framework is a potential strategy for controllably generating CF3 radicals under visible-light irradiation and harnessing the aromatic drug candidates that lack of covalent binding moieties.
Here, we show that incorporating thiophene groups into the ligand14 bearing TPA moiety allows us to modify the potential photochemical properties of TPA-based coordination polymer with the aim of formulating a new system for direct trifluoromethylation of aromatics in a heterogeneous manner (Fig. 1). We envision that the enlarged π-system created by the insertion of thiophene moieties into the backbone of the TPA-based ligand would improve the visible-light harvesting ability and tune the photoelectronic performance to generate reactive CF3 radicals with milder reactivity, and allow for more efficient oxidation of the radical adduct. Simultaneously, enhanced interactions between organic dyes cause the metal nodes to distort, creating coordination vacancies for the docking of substrates in close proximity to the photocatalytically active centres (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, the intrinsic crystalline nature of coordination polymers allows for structural analyses of the intermediates formed in each activation and catalytic step, offering an excellent platform for studying photon capture, electron delivery, and catalytic activation17,18.
Results
Synthesis and characterization of the photocatalyst
A solvothermal reaction between H3TCTA (tris[4-(5-carboxy-2-thienyl)phenyl]amine) and Zn(NO3)2·6H2O in DMF at 100 °C afforded a new coordination polymer, Zn–TCTA, in a 70% yield. Single-crystal X-ray structural analysis revealed that this polymer crystallizes in the R-3c space group. The distorted geometry of the Zn4O units is enforced by interlayer π···π interactions between TCTA moieties, endowing zinc atoms with empty coordination sites for potential substrate binding and activation (Supplementary Fig. 4). Each TCTA3− anion bridges three Zn4O clusters, and each Zn4O cluster is connected to six different TCTA3− anions, forming a two-dimensional sheet. These deprotonated ligands are located above or below the two-dimensional sheets, creating undulating surfaces and intralayer cavities in the metal–organic sheets (Fig. 1b). Adjacent sheets assemble in an ABCABC fashion through π···π stacking interactions between the planar 4-thiophenylphenyl moieties of the ligands to form a three-dimensional porous structure (Fig. 1d). It is postulated that the interlayer stacking mode can enhance the excitation delocalization and light-harvesting ability of polymers19, benefiting photocatalytic reactions under visible-light irradiation. Additionally, the interlayer stacking mode is also expected to provide the possibility of exfoliating the polymers into two-dimensional materials20, which is expected to enhance their catalytic properties. The hexagonal pocket windows of the intralayer cavities were plugged from the direction of the c-axis to retain horizontal open channels with cross-sections of 10.4 × 18.0 Å2 (Fig. 1d). A methylene blue dye uptake experiment with Zn–TCTA was used to demonstrate the guest accessibility, and the experiement yielded a dye uptake of 2.8% of the catalyst weight, as determined by the UV–vis spectra (Supplementary Fig. 8).
The UV–vis absorption spectrum of solid-state Zn–TCTA exhibited a remarkable redshift and broader absorption band than that observed for TPA-based MOF–15014 (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 9). Solid-state electrochemical measurements revealed an oxidative potential of 1.17 V (Supplementary Fig. 10), and the reductive potential of the excited state was determined to be −1.22 V on the basis of a free energy change of 2.39 eV (Fig. 2a). In comparison to the photocatalyst fac-Ir(Fppy)321, Zn–TCTA has a weaker but sufficient photoreductive ability to reduce trifluoromethanesulfonyl chloride (TfCl, E1/2red = −0.18 V vs. saturated calomel electrode)4 and generate CF3 radicals with milder reactivity. The more positive oxidative potential of the dyes in Zn–TCTA is expected to oxidize the CF3 radical adduct more efficiently to complete the catalytic cycle. The quenched emission at 546 nm (Fig. 2b) and the substantially decreased fluorescence lifetime (Supplementary Fig. 12) of the Zn–TCTA suspension upon the addition of TfCl indicated a classical photoinduced electron transfer process from the excited state of the TCTA moiety to TfCl, which directly yielded active CF3 radicals.
Heterogeneous photocatalytic trifluoromethylation
In a typical procedure, a reaction mixture of heterocycle 1a (0.25 mmol), 2,4,6-collidine (0.50 mmol), TfCl (0.50 mmol), and 2.5 mol% Zn–TCTA (per mole organic dye ligand) in acetonitrile (1 mL) was subjected to visible-light irradiation from a 23 W household light bulb. An 84% yield of the desired product 2a with the CF3 group positioned at the metabolically susceptible α-position of the carbonyl group22 was obtained after 24 h (Figs. 3c, and 5, 2a). The control experiments indicated that light, an inert atmosphere, and Zn–TCTA were indispensable for the reaction to proceed (Supplementary Table 2, entries 5–7). It should be noted that the addition of the radical scavenger tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl (TEMPO) to the reaction mixture inhibited the reaction (Supplementary Table 2, entry 13). For the reaction mixture with 2-methyl-2-nitrosopropane dimer (MNP dimer, a typical CF3 radical scavenger) as a substitute for the substrate, a singlet–triplet splitting signal corresponding to the CF3–MNP• adduct was observed by in situ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy (g value = 2.006)23 under visible-light irradiation. These results suggested the formation of CF3 radicals via a photoinduced single electron transfer pathway (Supplementary Fig. 29). 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of the digested crystals revealed that Zn–TCTA could adsorb approximately 2.0 equivalents (equiv) of 1a per unit (Fig. 2c). The infrared (IR) spectrum of the 1a-impregnated crystals showed the C=C stretching vibrations of 1a at 1560 cm−1, indicating the fixation and possible activation of the alkene moiety within the pores of the coordination polymer (Fig. 2d).
Single-crystal X-ray structural analysis on the substrate-impregnated crystal 1a@ Zn–TCTA revealed that the framework and pores of Zn–TCTA were retained upon uptake of the substrate18,24, and indicated that 1a was fixed near the inner surface of the confined pores by coordination interactions between the unprotected zinc atom and the carbonyl oxygen of 1a (O1a···Zn distance of ca. 2.20 Å). The enforced close proximity between the photoactive TCTA3− unit and the metabolically susceptible α-position of 1a (shortest interatomic distance of ca. 3.75 Å for α-position vs. ca. 4.11 Å for δ-position, respectively) provided the possibility to accelerate the reaction at the α-position16 (Figs. 3d, e and Supplementary Fig. 18). Because the oxidation of the CF3 radical adduct, which is known to be the rate-determining step6, could be accelerated by the closer spatial proximity in the case of CF3 radical addition at the α-position of the carbonyl group, the specific spatial orientation of Zn–TCTA in the pores is expected to create the distinctive regioselectivity of trifluoromethylation in comparison to photocatalysis at the δ-position by fac-Ir(Fppy)34 (Fig. 3b). In this case, both the electronic and spatial effects are important to the heterogeneous reaction in the pores of Zn–TCTA with microdynamics that are distinct from those of the homogeneous reaction.
After photocatalysis, Zn–TCTA was easily isolated from the reaction mixture by centrifugation, and the time-dependent conversion plots revealed that the photocatalyst could be reused at least three times without a remarkable decrease in reactivity (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Table 2, entries 10–12). The unchanged substrate ingress/egress ability of the recovered solids after three runs compared with that of the Zn–TCTA block crystals suggested that the capacity of the Zn–TCTA pores was mainly retained (Supplementary Fig. 14). The X-ray powder diffraction pattern of the recovered catalyst indicated that the integrity of Zn–TCTA was basically maintained during the reaction. The remarkably decreased diffraction peak observed at a low angle possibly suggested the deterioration of long-range order in the vertical direction (Supplementary Fig. 25). It should also be noted that the micron-sized thin layers were exfoliated25,26 in situ from single-crystal blocks of the polymer on the basis of the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Supplementary Fig. 26) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 27) images. Low-pressure N2 adsorption/desorption of fresh Zn–TCTA and the recycled sample were conducted at 77 K. Both of fresh crystals of Zn–TCTA and the recovered sample exhibited a Type-I sorption behaviour, with Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of 1383 and 1600 m2 g−1, respectively, which were calculated from N2 adsorption isotherms. Compared with the case of fresh Zn–TCTA, the mildly increased BET surface area of recovered sample might be attributed to the in situ exfoliation. The maintained pore size distributions reflected the stability of coordination polymer and the integrity of pores during photocatalysis (Supplementary Fig. 28).
Considering the unavoidable loss when recycling a small amount of catalyst after each run, a time-course experiment was performed using a large excess of 1a (2.5 mmol, 10 equiv). With the same quantity of Zn–TCTA (6.25 μmol, 2.5 mol%) and intermittent charging of the original amounts (0.50 mmol, 2.0 equiv) of TfCl and the base additive each day, a final NMR yield of ca. 95% was obtained after ten consecutive catalytic runs without further derivatization of 2a. It should be noted that the homogeneous control experiment exhibited remarkably destructive consumption of product 2a’ when exposed to an excess of the reactive species over prolonged reaction times (Fig. 4b).
This approach can be applied to aromatic substrates bearing common heteroatomic functional groups that may act as drug candidates, enabling the photocatalytic reaction without the need for prefunctionalization of the arenes (Fig. 5). Gratifyingly, bioactive heteroarenes, such as derivatives of uracil (1b), caffeine (1d), theophylline (1e), and coumarin (1f), can be trifluoromethylated at metabolically susceptible positions with comparable yields. Note that this methodology was successfully extended to a series of fine chemicals or drug candidates with ambiguous aromatic reaction sites, such as the flavourant methylvanillin (1l), the female hormone estrone derivative (1m), and the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug derivatives of ibuprofen (1n) and indomethacin (1o) with distinctive regioselectivity in comparison to the case using fac-Ir(Fppy)3 as a photocatalyst (Supplementary Fig. 21). When substrate 1p, which has a molecular size larger than the cross-section of the open channel in the pores of Zn–TCTA (Supplementary Fig. 16), was employed, a lower yield (<10%) was detected (2p). Such a size-dependent transformation suggests that the catalytic reaction occurs within the pores of Zn–TCTA, and the specific spatial orientation in the pores of Zn–TCTA can forge the improved and distinctive regioselectivity of trifluoromethylation compared with that obtained via homogeneous photocatalysis (Fig. 3b)4. Moreover, this heterogeneous route was amenable to either gram-scale preparation (2a†) or the introduction of a different perfluoroalkyl group by using C4F9SO2Cl (2aa) instead of TfCl. In this case, our approach offers a potentially applicable route to effective protection of metabolically labile sites of late-stage drug intermediates via regioselective aryl trifluoromethyl functionalization.
Heterogeneous photocatalytic trifluoromethylation-arylation
By employing a series of N-aryl-methacrylamides and N-aroyl-methacrylamides as substrates, we extended the photocatalytic approach to the selective conversion of unsaturated olefin27 moieties through tandem alkenyl trifluoromethylation-arylation (Fig. 6)28. This reaction involves an initial CF3 radical addition to an unsaturated alkene, intramolecular arylation of the CF3 radical adduct29,30, subsequent oxidation, and final deprotonation to afford biologically interesting 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl oxindoles31,32 and isoquinolinediones33 in considerable yields. When substrates bearing meta-substituted aryl moieties were used, only one type of regioisomer was obtained, indicating the high regioselectivities of the reactions (4c–4e). In addition to CF3, other perfluoroalkyl moieties, such as C4F9, could also be introduced to the oxindole scaffold through this methodology (4aa).
Single-crystal structural analysis of 3a@Zn–TCTA suggested that the polymer structure was retained upon uptake of the substrate. Weak coordination interactions were also found between the metal node and carbonyl group of 3a (O···Zn distance of ca. 3.76 Å), and C–H···π interactions were observed between the phenyl edge of TCTA3− and phenyl π-plane of 3a (Fig. 7a and Supplementary Fig. 19). These interactions docked the substrates in confined spaces to facilitate tandem radical reactions. When no covalent anchoring positions are available on the substrate, the noncovalent substrate–catalyst interactions are critical for stereocontrol of the reaction; however, they are inherently labile toward thermal motions in solutions. Therefore, homogeneous stereoselective photoredox catalysis has long been hindered by the dearth of effective noncovalent binding strategies34–37. Inspired by previously described substrate–catalyst interaction patterns, we envisioned that multiple noncovalent interactions within a framework might induce a stereobias in CF3 radical transformations, increasing the molecular robustness towards oxidative metabolism of sp3 C–H bonds with stereospecificity.
As shown in Fig. 6 (i.e., 4f–4j), N-aroyl-methacrylamide substrates bearing vicinal dialkyl-substituted unsaturated alkene moieties afforded products in good yields and diastereoselectivities as high as 95:5, which are superior to that obtained from a previously reported homogeneous approach38. Notably, 3j, bearing a cyclic allyl moiety, which predominantly forms oligomers in the homogeneous case, was readily converted in a diastereocontrolled manner (d.r. of ca. 94:6) with an acceptable conversion in the presence of Zn–TCTA.
A detailed structural analysis of a single crystal of the substrate-enriched framework 3f@Zn–TCTA indicated that within the confined environment, the unsaturated alkenyl and phenyl groups of 3f were folded in a face-to-face configuration by the C–H···O interactions between the node and N-methyl group of 3f (C···O distance of ca. 3.46 Å) as well as by the C–H···π interactions between the phenyl edge of TCTA3− and the phenyl π-system of 3f. The proximity between the α-carbon atom of the alkenyl group and the hydrogen atom in the ortho-position of the phenyl ring shielded the apparent Re-face of the alkenyl β-carbon, facilitating the formation of a properly oriented early transition state39 to direct the tandem radical reactions in a highly diastereoselective manner (Figs. 7b, c and Supplementary Fig. 20).
Discussion
In conclusion, a new approach was developed for heterogeneous, efficient and site-specific trifluoromethylation of aromatic drug candidates without any directing groups. This approach included the insertion of thiophene moieties into the backbone of a TPA-based ligand to extend the light-harvesting ability and tune the photoelectronic properties. The enlarged π-system of the ligand favoured the interaction patterns to distort the coordination geometries of the metal nodes. The potential interactions of the metal nods docked the substrates near the photocatalytically active centres to directly activate the reaction sites of the substrates in special conformations. The comprehensive improvement in the electronic and spatial effects within the coordination polymer balanced the contradictory demands of the electronic effects and reaction dynamics, achieving regio- and diastereoselective discrimination between the reaction sites with unremarkable electronic/steric differences.
Methods
Materials and measurements
Unless otherwise stated, solvents were dried and distilled prior to use according to standard methods. 1,1′,1″-[Nitrilotris(4,1-phenylenethiene-5,2-diyl)]triethanone, the precursor of H3TCTA40, and the starting materials 1p41, 3a and 3c42, 3b, 3d to 3i43, and 3j38 were synthesized according to literature methods. The other substrates were commercially available and used as received. Thin-layer chromatography was carried out on SiO2 (silica gel 60 F254, Merck), and the spots were identified with UV light.
NMR spectrum were measured on a Bruker Avance 500 WB and Bruker Avance 400 WB spectrometer, and chemical shifts were recorded in parts per million (ppm, δ). High-resolution mass spectrum (HRMS) were recorded on an liquid chromatography/quadrupole–time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Micromass, England) equipped with a Z-spray ionization source. Elemental analyses were performed on a Vario EL III elemental analyser. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) was conducted on a NexION 300D spectrometer. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out with a Mettler-Toledo TGA/SDTA851 instrument.
Powder X-ray diffractogram measurements were performed with a PANalytical Empyrean X-ray powder diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation, 40 kV, 40 mA). Fourier Transform-IR spectra were recorded using KBr pellets on a JASCO FT/IR-430 instrument. The solid and liquid UV–vis spectra were recorded on a Hitachi U-4100 UV–vis–NIR spectrophotometer and TU-1900 spectrophotometer, respectively. TEM images were collected on a Tecnai F30 microscope. SEM images were carried out over a Nova NanoSEM 450 microscope.
Solid-state cyclic voltammograms were measured using a carbon-paste working electrode; a well-ground mixture of each bulk sample and carbon paste (graphite and mineral oil) was set in the channel of a glass tube and connected to a copper wire. A platinum-wire counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode were used in an aqueous solution of KNO3. The solid fluorescent spectrum were measured on an Edinburgh FS920 instrument. The time-resolved luminescence spectrum were measured on an Edinburgh FLS920 spectrometer.
Single-crystal X-ray crystallography
Intensities were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer with graphite monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) using the SMART and SAINT programs44,45. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined on F2 by full-matrix least-squares methods with SHELXTL version 5.146. Hydrogen atoms were fixed geometrically at calculated positions and allowed to ride on the parent nonhydrogen atoms. The SQUEEZE program was carried out for crystals Zn–TCTA, 1a@Zn–TCTA, and 3a@Zn–TCTA. Crystallographic data for Zn–TCTA, 1a@Zn–TCTA, 3a@Zn–TCTA, and 3f@Zn–TCTA are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. For all of the crystal data, one of the carboxylate oxygen atoms was disordered into two parts with the site occupancy factor (s.o.f.) of each part fixed at 0.5.
In the refinement of crystal data of 1a@Zn–TCTA, 3a@Zn–TCTA, and 3f@Zn–TCTA, to help the stability of the refinement for the impregnated related substrate molecules, the bond distances between several atoms were fixed; the geometrical constraints of idealized regular polygons were used for benzene rings, and thermal parameters on adjacent atoms in two molecules were restrained to be similar. The A alert error in the checklist for 3f@Zn–TCTA is due to the partial occupancy of the substrate molecules.
Synthesis of Zn–TCTA
A mixture of H3TCTA (93 mg, 0.15 mmol), Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O (297 mg, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in 6 mL DMF in a Teflon-lined steel autoclave. The resulting mixture was kept in an oven at 100 °C for 3 days. The block red-brown crystals for X-ray structural analysis were collected by filtration, washed with acetonitrile, and then dried under vacuum. Yield: 70%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6/DCl): δ = 7.72–7.70 (m, 9H), 7.50 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 3H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 3H).
Dye uptake experiments
Crystals of Zn–TCTA were soaked in a saturated solution of methylene blue in acetonitrile for 12 h, and the resulting crystals were washed with acetonitrile thoroughly until the solution became clear. The dried sample was dissociated by concentrated hydrochloric acid, and the resultant clear solution with a light olivine colour was diluted to 10 mL and adjusted to a pH of 1.5. The dye concentration was determined by comparing the solution UV–vis absorption with a standard curve of the dye.
Substrate ingress and egress experiments
Crystals of Zn–TCTA was soaked in a solution of substrate 1a in acetonitrile (0.25 mmol/mL), and the mixture was shaken by a vortex reactor. The uptake amount of 1a was monitored by time-course sampling of supernatant and gas chromatography (GC). The previously obtained crystals saturated with substrate 1a was washed with a minimum amount of acetonitrile to remove the substrate absorbed on the surface, then immersed in acetonitrile, and shaken by a vortex reactor. The release amount of 1a was monitored time-coursely by GC analysis.
General procedure (GP) for photocatalysis by Zn–TCTA
To a predried Pyrex tube equipped with a cooling water system, specified amounts of Zn–TCTA crystals (0.00625 mmol) and substrate (0.25 mmol) were added. After adding acetonitrile (1 mL), 2,4,6-collidine (0.50 mmol), and TfCl (0.50 mmol) by syringe, the reaction mixture was stirred and illuminated with visible light by a 23 W household light under N2 atmosphere for 24 h. The catalyst was recovered by centrifugation and filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The product was isolated via flash chromatography on silica gel from the crude mixture.
Typical procedure for ten consecutive photocatalysis runs
To a predried Pyrex tube equipped with a cooling water system, specified amounts of photocatalyst Zn–TCTA (0.00625 mmol) and substrate 1a (2.5 mmol) were added. After adding acetonitrile, 2,4,6-collidine (0.50 mmol) and TfCl (0.50 mmol) were added by syringe, and the reaction mixture was stirred and illuminated with visible light by a 23 W household light under N2 atmosphere for 24 h. Then, another 0.5 mmol of additive base and TfCl were added, and the reaction was intermittently charged with the previously mentioned reagents for a total of ten times. When fac-Ir(Fppy)3 was used as the photocatalyst, the reaction was performed according to the literature protocol4, except for the use of ten equiv of 1a (2.5 mmol) and the intermittently charged additive base and TfCl.
Substrate encapsulation experiments
The substrate-impregnated crystals were obtained by soaking crystals of Zn–TCTA in a solution of the substrate in acetonitrile (1 M) for 12 h. After the soaked Zn–TCTA was washed with acetonitrile, the substrate-loaded crystals were directly used for single-crystal X-ray diffraction and IR or digested with DMSO-d6/DCl, and the amounts of released substrate molecules were quantified by 1H NMR.
N2 adsorption/desorption measurements
Low-pressure N2 sorption were conducted by using a Micrometritics ASAP 2020 measurements surface area and pore size analyzer up to saturated pressure at 77 K. Before the N2 sorption measurements, the fresh crystals of Zn–TCTA and the recovered sample were washed with acetonitrile and then subjected to vacuum heating.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21402020, U1608224, and 21531001), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT16RC(4)09 and DUT18LK50), and the 111 Project (B16008).
Author contributions
T.Z. and X.G. contributed equally to this work. T.Z. and C.D. conceived the project, designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. T.Z., X.G. and Y.S. performed the experiments. C.H. and C.D. solved and refined the X-ray crystal structures. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Data availability
The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for the structures reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) under the deposition numbers CCDC 1407818, 1546691, 1415189, and 1415190 (Supplementary Table 1). These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-05919-6.
References
- 1.Müller K, Faeh C, Diederich F. Fluorine in pharmaceuticals: looking beyond intuition. Science. 2007;317:1881–1886. doi: 10.1126/science.1131943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Furuya T, Kamlet AS, Ritter T. Catalysis for fluorination and trifluoromethylation. Nature. 2011;473:470–477. doi: 10.1038/nature10108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Studer AA. “Renaissance” in radical trifluoromethylation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:8950–8958. doi: 10.1002/anie.201202624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nagib DA, MacMillan DWC. Trifluoromethylation of arenes and heteroarenes by means of photoredox catalysis. Nature. 2011;480:224–228. doi: 10.1038/nature10647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu X, Xu C, Wang M, Liu Q. Trifluoromethyltrimethylsilane: nucleophilic trifluoromethylation and beyond. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:683–730. doi: 10.1021/cr400473a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Charpentier J, Früh N, Togni A. Electrophilic trifluoromethylation by use of hypervalent iodine reagents. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:650–682. doi: 10.1021/cr500223h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alonso C, De Marigorta EM, Rubiales G, Palacios F. Carbon trifluoromethylation reactions of hydrocarbon derivatives and heteroarenes. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:1847–1935. doi: 10.1021/cr500368h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang T, Lin W. Metal–organic frameworks for artificial photosynthesis and photocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:5982–5993. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00103F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dhakshinamoorthy A, Asiri AM, García H. Metal–organic framework (MOF) compounds: photocatalysts for redox reactions and solar fuel production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:5414–5445. doi: 10.1002/anie.201505581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Quah HS, et al. Multiphoton harvesting metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7954. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mondloch JE, et al. Vapor-phase metalation by atomic layer deposition in a metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:10294–10297. doi: 10.1021/ja4050828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zeng L, et al. Organized aggregation makes insoluble perylene diimide efficient for the reduction of aryl halides via consecutive visible light-induced electron-transfer processes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:3958–3961. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b12931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao M, Ou S, Wu CD. Porous metal–organic frameworks for heterogeneous biomimetic catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014;47:1199–1207. doi: 10.1021/ar400265x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chae HK, Kim J, Friedrichs OD, Keeffe MO, Yaghi OM. Design of frameworks with mixed triangular and octahedral building blocks exemplified by the structure of [Zn4O(TCA)2] having the pyrite topology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:3907–3909. doi: 10.1002/anie.200351546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu P, et al. Photoactive chiral metal–organic frameworks for light-driven asymmetric α-alkylation of aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:14991–14999. doi: 10.1021/ja305367j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xia Z, He C, Wang X, Duan C. Modifying electron transfer between photoredox and organocatalytic units via framework interpenetration for β-carbonyl functionalization. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:361. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00416-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kawamichi T, Haneda T, Kawano M, Fujita M. X-ray observation of a transient hemiaminal trapped in a porous network. Nature. 2009;461:633–635. doi: 10.1038/nature08326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Inokuma Y, et al. X-ray analysis on the nanogram to microgram scale using porous complexes. Nature. 2013;495:461–466. doi: 10.1038/nature11990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grimsdale AC, Müllen K. The chemistry of organic nanomaterials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:5592–5629. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bétard A, Fischer RA. Metal–organic framework thin films: from fundamentals to applications. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:1055–1083. doi: 10.1021/cr200167v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lalevée J, et al. Subtle ligand effects in oxidative photocatalysis with iridium complexes: application to photopolymerization. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:15027–15031. doi: 10.1002/chem.201101445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zefirov NS, et al. Degradation of pyridine by Arthrobacter crystallopoietes and Rhodococcus opocus strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1994;118:71–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06805.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Peng YY, Huang J, Qu YL, Zhao CX. ESR studies on the solvation of perfluoro-n-alkyl t-butyl nitroxides—a new scale for electronegativity of perfluoro-n-alkyl groups. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2000;26:587–597. doi: 10.1163/156856700X00552. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jing X, He C, Dong D, Yang L, Duan C. Homochiral crystallization of metal–organic silver frameworks: asymmetric [3 + 2] cycloaddition of an azomethine ylide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:10127–10131. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peng Y, et al. Metal–organic framework nanosheets as building blocks for molecular sieving membranes. Science. 2014;346:1356–1359. doi: 10.1126/science.1254227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Junggeburth SC, et al. Ultrathin 2D coordination polymer nanosheets by surfactant-mediated synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:6157–6164. doi: 10.1021/ja312567v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yu X, Cohen SM. For the photocatalytic fluoroalkylation of saturated olefins in the presence of coordination polymer. Photocatalytic metal–organic frameworks for selective 2,2,2-trifluoroethylation of styrenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:12320–12323. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Egami H, Sodeoka M. Trifluoromethylation of alkenes with concomitant introduction of additional functional groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:8294–8308. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wu Z, Wang D, Liu Y, Huan L, Zhu C. Chemo- and regioselective distal heteroaryl ipso-migration: a general protocol for heteroarylation of unactivated alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:1388–1391. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xu Y, Wu Z, Jiang J, Ke Z, Zhu C. Merging distal alkynyl migration and photoredox catalysis for radical trifluoromethylative alkynylation of unactivated olefins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:4545–4548. doi: 10.1002/anie.201700413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Galliford CV, Scheidt KA. Pyrrolidinyl-spirooxindole natural products as inspirations for the development of potential therapeutic agents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:8748–8758. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jimenez JI, Huber U, Moore RE, Patterson GM. Oxidized welwitindolinones from terrestrial fischerella spp. J. Nat. Prod. 1999;62:569–572. doi: 10.1021/np980485t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vernekar SKV, et al. Design, synthesis, biochemical, and antiviral evaluations of C6 benzyl and C6 biarylmethyl substituted 2-hydroxylisoquinoline-1,3-diones: dual inhibition against HIV reverse transcriptase-associated RNase H and polymerase with antiviral activities. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:651–664. doi: 10.1021/jm501132s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Inoue Y. Asymmetric photochemical reactions in solution. Chem. Rev. 1992;92:741–770. doi: 10.1021/cr00013a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nicewicz DA, MacMillan DWC. Merging photoredox catalysis with organocatalysis: the direct asymmetric alkylation of aldehydes. Science. 2008;322:77–80. doi: 10.1126/science.1161976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gong L, Wenzel M, Meggers E. Chiral-auxiliary-mediated asymmetric synthesis of ruthenium polypyridyl complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011;46:2635–2644. doi: 10.1021/ar400083u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Du J, Skubi KL, Schultz DM, Yoon TP. A dual-catalysis approach to enantioselective [2+2] photocycloadditions using visible light. Science. 2014;344:392–396. doi: 10.1126/science.1251511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kong W, Casimiro M, Fuentes N, Merino E, Nevado C. Metal-free aryltrifluoro methylation of activated alkenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:13086–13090. doi: 10.1002/anie.201307377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Porter NA, Giese B, Curran DP. Acyclic stereochemical control in free-radical reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991;24:296–304. doi: 10.1021/ar00010a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Min J, et al. Effects of oligothiophene π-bridge length on physical and photovoltaic properties of star-shaped molecules for bulk heterojunction solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:16135–16147. doi: 10.1039/C4TA01933D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kalgutkar AS, Marnett AB, Crews BC, Remmel RP, Marnett LJ. Ester and amide derivatives of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, indomethacin, as selective Cy-clooxygenase-2 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2000;43:2860–2870. doi: 10.1021/jm000004e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pinto A, Jia Y, Neuville L, Zhu J. Palladium-catalyzed enantioselective domino Heck-cyanation sequence: development and application to the total synthesis of Esermethole and Physostigmine. Chem. Eur. J. 2007;13:961–967. doi: 10.1002/chem.200601016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Millet A, Baudoin O. Palladium-catalyzed γ-selective arylation of zincated boc-allyl amines. Org. Lett. 2014;16:3998–4000. doi: 10.1021/ol5018257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.SMART Data collection software (v5.629) (Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, 2003).
- 45.SAINT, Data reduction software (v6.45) (Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, 2003).
- 46.Sheldrick GM. SHELX-97, Program for Crystal Structure Analysis. Göttingen: University of Göttingen; 1997. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for the structures reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) under the deposition numbers CCDC 1407818, 1546691, 1415189, and 1415190 (Supplementary Table 1). These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon request.